Postoperative Daycare as a Safe and Cost-Effective Option for Secondary Alveolar Bone Graft (SABG) Surgery: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study
- PMID: 37097837
- DOI: 10.1177/10556656231171210
Postoperative Daycare as a Safe and Cost-Effective Option for Secondary Alveolar Bone Graft (SABG) Surgery: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting (SABG) in patients treated either in daycare or with multiple day hospitalization (MDH) in relation to costs and complication rates.
Design: Retrospective comparative cohort study.
Setting: The data was collected from two settings: Postoperative daycare or MDH after oral cleft surgery in an Academic Medical Center in The Netherlands.
Patients: Data of 137 patients with unilateral Cleft lip, alveolus, and palate (CLAP) treated between 2006-2018 were evaluated. Registered clinical variables: age, gender, cleft subtype, bone donor site, type of hospitalization, length of stay, additional surgery, complications, surgeons, and costs.
Interventions: Closure of the alveolar cleft with/without closure of the anterior palate.
Main outcome measures: Univariate analyses.
Results: Of the 137 patients, 46.7% were treated in MDH, and 53.3% in daycare. Total costs for daycare were significantly lower (P < .001). All patients treated in daycare received mandibular symphysis bone, whereas in MDH, 46.9% received iliac crest bone instead. Bone donor site was associated with postoperative care type. Complication rates were slightly but not significantly higher in daycare (26%) vs. MDH (14.1%) (P = .09). Most were Grade I (minor) according to Clavien Dindo classification.
Conclusions: Daycare after alveolar cleft surgery is about as safe as MDH, but significantly cheaper.
Keywords: alveolar cleft; bone grafting; complication; cost; postoperative care; surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Similar articles
-
Alveolar Bone Grafting: Donor Site Review of 100 Consecutive Cases in Cleft Lip and Palate.Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017 Mar;54(2):137-141. doi: 10.1597/15-180. Epub 2015 Oct 27. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017. PMID: 26506046
-
Comparison of tooth development stage of the maxillary anterior teeth before and after secondary alveolar bone graft: Unilateral cleft lip and alveolus vs unilateral cleft lip and palate.Angle Orthod. 2014 Nov;84(6):989-94. doi: 10.2319/011014-38.1. Epub 2014 Apr 15. Angle Orthod. 2014. PMID: 24731061 Free PMC article.
-
Secondary alveolar bone grafting in cleft lip and palate: A comparative analysis of donor site morbidity in different age groups.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Jan;47(1):165-169. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Nov 12. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019. PMID: 30527380
-
Secondary alveolar bone grafting using autologous versus alloplastic material in the treatment of cleft lip and palate patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.Prog Orthod. 2019 Feb 11;20(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40510-018-0252-y. Prog Orthod. 2019. PMID: 30740615 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of early and conventional autogenous secondary alveolar bone graft in children with cleft lip and palate: A systematic review.Orthod Craniofac Res. 2020 Nov;23(4):385-397. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12394. Epub 2020 Jun 28. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2020. PMID: 32446283
Cited by
-
Three-dimensional printed titanium mesh combined with iliac cancellous bone in the reconstruction of mandibular defects secondary to ameloblastoma resection.BMC Oral Health. 2023 Sep 20;23(1):681. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03386-0. BMC Oral Health. 2023. PMID: 37730602 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials