Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Apr 25;28(1):157.
doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01121-7.

Biofilm and wound healing: from bench to bedside

Affiliations
Review

Biofilm and wound healing: from bench to bedside

Aakansha Giri Goswami et al. Eur J Med Res. .

Abstract

The bubbling community of microorganisms, consisting of diverse colonies encased in a self-produced protective matrix and playing an essential role in the persistence of infection and antimicrobial resistance, is often referred to as a biofilm. Although apparently indolent, the biofilm involves not only inanimate surfaces but also living tissue, making it truly ubiquitous. The mechanism of biofilm formation, its growth, and the development of resistance are ever-intriguing subjects and are yet to be completely deciphered. Although an abundance of studies in recent years has focused on the various ways to create potential anti-biofilm and antimicrobial therapeutics, a dearth of a clear standard of clinical practice remains, and therefore, there is essentially a need for translating laboratory research to novel bedside anti-biofilm strategies that can provide a better clinical outcome. Of significance, biofilm is responsible for faulty wound healing and wound chronicity. The experimental studies report the prevalence of biofilm in chronic wounds anywhere between 20 and 100%, which makes it a topic of significant concern in wound healing. The ongoing scientific endeavor to comprehensively understand the mechanism of biofilm interaction with wounds and generate standardized anti-biofilm measures which are reproducible in the clinical setting is the challenge of the hour. In this context of "more needs to be done", we aim to explore various effective and clinically meaningful methods currently available for biofilm management and how these tools can be translated into safe clinical practice.

Keywords: Bacteria; Biofilm; Debridement; Quorum sensing; Wound healing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Biofilm-based wound care (BBWC): schema of workflow

References

    1. Heukelekian H, Heller A. Relation between food concentration and surface for bacterial growth. J Bacteriol. 1940;40:547–558. doi: 10.1128/jb.40.4.547-558.1940. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Geesey GG, Richardson WT, Yeomans HG, Irvin RT, Costerton JW. Microscopic examination of natural sessile bacterial populations from an alpine stream. Can J Microbiol. 1977;23(12):1733–1736. doi: 10.1139/m77-249. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jones HC, Roth IL, Saunders WM., III Electron microscopic study of a slime layer. J Bacteriol. 1969;99:316–325. doi: 10.1128/jb.99.1.316-325.1969. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Characklis WG. Attached microbial growths-II Frictional resistance due to microbial slimes. Water Res. 1973;7:1249–1258. doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(73)90002-X. - DOI
    1. Costerton JW, Geesey GG, Cheng KJ. How bacteria stick. Sci Am. 1978;238(1):86–95. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0178-86. - DOI - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources