Main conclusions and perspectives from the collective scientific assessment of the effects of plant protection products on biodiversity and ecosystem services along the land-sea continuum in France and French overseas territories
- PMID: 37099095
- DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-26952-z
Main conclusions and perspectives from the collective scientific assessment of the effects of plant protection products on biodiversity and ecosystem services along the land-sea continuum in France and French overseas territories
Erratum in
-
Correction to: Main conclusions and perspectives from the collective scientific assessment of the effects of plant protection products on biodiversity and ecosystem services along the land-sea continuum in France and French overseas territories.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025 Feb;32(8):4927-4928. doi: 10.1007/s11356-025-36011-4. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025. PMID: 39888527 No abstract available.
Abstract
Preservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services is critical for sustainable development and human well-being. However, an unprecedented erosion of biodiversity is observed and the use of plant protection products (PPP) has been identified as one of its main causes. In this context, at the request of the French Ministries responsible for the Environment, for Agriculture and for Research, a panel of 46 scientific experts ran a nearly 2-year-long (2020-2022) collective scientific assessment (CSA) of international scientific knowledge relating to the impacts of PPP on biodiversity and ecosystem services. The scope of this CSA covered the terrestrial, atmospheric, freshwater, and marine environments (with the exception of groundwater) in their continuity from the site of PPP application to the ocean, in France and French overseas territories, based on international knowledge produced on or transposable to this type of context (climate, PPP used, biodiversity present, etc.). Here, we provide a brief summary of the CSA's main conclusions, which were drawn from about 4500 international publications. Our analysis finds that PPP contaminate all environmental matrices, including biota, and cause direct and indirect ecotoxicological effects that unequivocally contribute to the decline of certain biological groups and alter certain ecosystem functions and services. Levers for action to limit PPP-driven pollution and effects on environmental compartments include local measures from plot to landscape scales and regulatory improvements. However, there are still significant gaps in knowledge regarding environmental contamination by PPPs and its effect on biodiversity and ecosystem functions and services. Perspectives and research needs are proposed to address these gaps.
Keywords: Biocontrol; Ecological risk assessment; Ecotoxicology; Environment; Expertise; Modelling; Pesticides.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Linking ecotoxicological effects on biodiversity and ecosystem functions to impairment of ecosystem services is a challenge: an illustration with the case of plant protection products.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025 Feb;32(6):2773-2785. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29128-x. Epub 2023 Aug 7. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025. PMID: 37548787
-
Collective scientific assessment as a relevant tool to inform public debate and policymaking: an illustration about the effects of plant protection products on biodiversity and ecosystem services.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jul;28(28):38448-38454. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14863-w. Epub 2021 Jun 16. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021. PMID: 34131840
-
Role of trophic interactions in transfer and cascading impacts of plant protection products on biodiversity: a literature review.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025 Feb;32(6):2993-3031. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-35190-w. Epub 2024 Oct 18. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025. PMID: 39422865 Review.
-
Wildlife ecotoxicology of plant protection products: knowns and unknowns about the impacts of currently used pesticides on terrestrial vertebrate biodiversity.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025 Feb;32(6):2893-2955. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-33026-1. Epub 2024 Apr 19. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025. PMID: 38639904 Review.
-
Characterizing environmental contamination by plant protection products along the land-to-sea continuum:a focus on France and French overseas territories.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025 Feb;32(6):2975-2992. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-34945-9. Epub 2024 Sep 16. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025. PMID: 39279021
References
-
- [MEA] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human wellbeing: synthesis. Island Press, Washington (DC), p 137
-
- Aubertot JN, Barbier JM, Carpentier A, Gril JJ, Guichard L, Lucas P, Savary S, Savini I, Voltz M (2007) Pesticides, agriculture et environnement. Réduire l’utilisation des pesticides et limiter leurs impacts environnementaux. In: Expertise scientifique collective Inra-Cemagref (décembre 2005). Quae, Versailles, p 120. https://hal.science/hal-01173732
-
- Baker LF, Mudge JF, Houlahan JE, Thompson DG, Kidd KA (2014) The direct and indirect effects of a glyphosate-based herbicide and nutrients on chironomidae (diptera) emerging from small wetlands. Environ Toxicol Chem 33:2076–2085. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2657 - DOI
-
- Bayat S, Geiser F, Kristiansen P, Wilson SC (2014) Organic contaminants in bats: trends and new issues. Envir Int 63:40–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2013.10.009 - DOI
-
- Beketov MA, Kefford BJ, Schafer RB, Liess M (2013) Pesticides reduce regional biodiversity of stream invertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:11039–11043. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1305618110 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous