Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct;33(10):6759-6770.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09672-3. Epub 2023 Apr 26.

Development and validation of a deep learning model for prediction of intracranial aneurysm rupture risk based on multi-omics factor

Affiliations

Development and validation of a deep learning model for prediction of intracranial aneurysm rupture risk based on multi-omics factor

Mirzat Turhon et al. Eur Radiol. 2023 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: The clinical ability of radiomics to predict intracranial aneurysm rupture risk remains unexplored. This study aims to investigate the potential uses of radiomics and explore whether deep learning (DL) algorithms outperform traditional statistical methods in predicting aneurysm rupture risk.

Methods: This retrospective study included 1740 patients with 1809 intracranial aneurysms confirmed by digital subtraction angiography at two hospitals in China from January 2014 to December 2018. We randomly divided the dataset (hospital 1) into training (80%) and internal validation (20%). External validation was performed using independent data collected from hospital 2. The prediction models were developed based on clinical, aneurysm morphological, and radiomics parameters by logistic regression (LR). Additionally, the DL model for predicting aneurysm rupture risk using integration parameters was developed and compared with other models.

Results: The AUCs of LR models A (clinical), B (morphological), and C (radiomics) were 0.678, 0.708, and 0.738, respectively (all p < 0.05). The AUCs of the combined feature models D (clinical and morphological), E (clinical and radiomics), and F (clinical, morphological, and radiomics) were 0.771, 0.839, and 0.849, respectively. The DL model (AUC = 0.929) outperformed the machine learning (ML) (AUC = 0.878) and the LR models (AUC = 0.849). Also, the DL model has shown good performance in the external validation datasets (AUC: 0.876 vs 0.842 vs 0.823, respectively).

Conclusion: Radiomics signatures play an important role in predicting aneurysm rupture risk. DL methods outperformed conventional statistical methods in prediction models for the rupture risk of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, integrating clinical, aneurysm morphological, and radiomics parameters.

Key points: • Radiomics parameters are associated with the rupture risk of intracranial aneurysms. • The prediction model based on integrating parameters in the deep learning model was significantly better than a conventional model. • The radiomics signature proposed in this study could guide clinicians in selecting appropriate patients for preventive treatment.

Keywords: Deep learning; Intracranial aneurysm; Stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Li MH, Chen SW, Li YD et al (2013) Prevalence of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in Chinese adults aged 35 to 75 years: a cross-sectional study. Ann Intern Med 159:514–521
    1. Hackenberg KAM, Hänggi D, Etminan N (2018) Unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 49(9):2268–2275 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morita A, Kirino T, Hashi K et al (2012) The natural course of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in a Japanese cohort. New Engl J Med 366:2474–2482 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Korja M, Kivisaari R, Rezai Jahromi B et al (2017) Natural history of ruptured but untreated intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 48:1081–1084 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Algra AM, Lindgren A, Vergouwen MDI et al (2019) Procedural clinical complications, case-fatality risks, and risk factors in endovascular and neurosurgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol 76(3):282–293

LinkOut - more resources