Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug;18(4):1325-1338.
doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01374-5. Epub 2023 Apr 26.

Implementation of a Cancer Rehabilitation Navigation Program: a qualitative analysis of implementation determinants and strategies

Nicole L Stout  1   2 , Shana E Harrington  3 , Ashley Perry  4 , Meryl J Alappattu  5   6 , Victoria Pfab  7 , Benjamin Stewart  7 , Mindi R Manes  6
Affiliations

Implementation of a Cancer Rehabilitation Navigation Program: a qualitative analysis of implementation determinants and strategies

Nicole L Stout et al. J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Cancer rehabilitation navigation (CRNav) is a care delivery model that expedites identification and management of symptom-related functional morbidity for individuals undergoing cancer treatment. A CRNav program is unique in that it embeds a cancer rehabilitation professional in the cancer center for patient screening and assessment. The implementation of CRNav programs has not been studied and doing so could facilitate greater uptake of these programs.

Methods: Using implementation science frameworks, we conducted a qualitative, post-implementation analysis of a CRNav program that was implemented in 2019. Semi-structured, 1:1 interviews were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and a combination of deductive and inductive analyses, using a priori established codes, was used to assess the implementation context, and identify emergent themes of barriers and facilitators to implementation. Participant described implementation strategies were characterized and defined using the Expert Consensus Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) taxonomy.

Results: Eleven stakeholders including physicians, administrators, clinical staff, and patients, involved with program development and the implementation effort, participated in interviews. Predominant barriers to implementation included developing the program infrastructure, and lack of awareness of rehabilitation services among oncology professionals, predominant facilitators of implementation included; physical co-location of the navigator in the cancer center, individual characteristics of the navigator, and unique characteristics of the program. Strategies described that supported implementation included developing stakeholder interrelationships, evaluating and iteratively adapting the program, creating infrastructure, training and education, and supporting clinicians.

Conclusion: This analysis uses implementation science to methodically analyze and characterize factors that may contribute to successful implementation of a CRNav program. These findings could be used alongside a prospective context-specific analysis to tailor future implementation efforts.

Implications for cancer survivors: Implementing a CRNav program expedites a patient's direct contact with a rehabilitation provider complementing the cancer care delivery team, and providing an additive and often missing service.

Keywords: Cancer rehabilitation; Implementation science; Oncology navigation; Qualitative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Stout NL, Silver JK, Raj VS, et al. Toward a National Initiative in Cancer Rehabilitation: Recommendations From a Subject Matter Expert Group. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(11):2006–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2016.05.002 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alfano CM, Zucker DS, Pergolotti M, et al. A Precision Medicine Approach to Improve Cancer Rehabilitation’s Impact and Integration with Cancer Care and Optimize Patient Wellness. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2017;5(1):64–73. - DOI
    1. Stout NL, Binkley JM, Schmitz KH, et al. A prospective surveillance model for rehabilitation for women with breast cancer. Cancer. 2012;118(8 Suppl):2191–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.27476 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bartolo M, Zucchella C, Pace A, et al. Early rehabilitation after surgery improves functional outcome in inpatients with brain tumours. J Neurooncol. 2012;107(3):537–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-011-0772-5 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arving C, Assmus J, Thormodsen I, Berntsen S, Nordin K. Early rehabilitation of cancer patients-An individual randomized stepped-care stress-management intervention. Psychooncology. 2019;28(2):301–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4940 . - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources