Ashes to eye: A skilled snake handler's experience with ophthalmic envenomation
- PMID: 37099489
- PMCID: PMC10132526
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011264
Ashes to eye: A skilled snake handler's experience with ophthalmic envenomation
Abstract
With the continued growth of human populations, rural urbanisation and habitat degradation are on the rise, resulting in the displacement of native wildlife and an increase in human-wildlife conflicts. The presence of human habitation and waste often attracts rodents and thereby, snakes, leading to increased snake sightings in homes. To address this problem, snake handlers, who are volunteers that remove and relocate snakes away from human development areas, are called upon. However, snake removal is a high-risk task that poses a risk of envenomation, particularly when dealing with spitting snakes. Several cobra species have the ability to spit venom. If the venom enters a person's eye, it can result in ophthalmic envenomation, which can have serious consequences for their eyesight. Therefore, snake handlers should take precautions, wear suitable eye protection, and use appropriate tools to ensure their safety and that of the snake. In this case, an experienced snake handler was called to remove a spitting cobra, but they were ill-equipped. During the removal, the venom was sprayed across the handler's face, and some of it entered their eye, resulting in ophthalmic envenomation. The handler promptly irrigated their eye, but medical treatment was still necessary. This report highlights the risks and consequences of ophthalmic injury and the importance of wearing appropriate eye protection and taking due care when dealing with venomous species, particularly those that can spit venom. It serves as a reminder that accidents can happen at any time and experienced snake handlers are not exempt from the risks.
Copyright: © 2023 Williams et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
References
-
- Dickman AJ. Complexities of conflict: the importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human–wildlife conflict. Animal Conservation. 2010;13(5):458–66.
-
- Soulsbury CD, White PCL. Human–wildlife interactions in urban areas: a review of conflicts, benefits and opportunities. Wildlife Research. 2015;42(7):541–53, 13.
-
- Acharya KP, Paudel PK, Jnawali SR, Neupane PR, Köhl M. Can forest fragmentation and configuration work as indicators of human–wildlife conflict? Evidences from human death and injury by wildlife attacks in Nepal. Ecological Indicators. 2017;80:74–83.
-
- de Souza JC, da Silva RM, Gonçalves MPR, Jardim RJD, Markwith SH. Habitat use, ranching, and human-wildlife conflict within a fragmented landscape in the Pantanal, Brazil. Biological Conservation. 2018;217:349–57.
-
- Yue S, Timothy C., BoneBrake, Gibson L. Human-snake conflict patterns in a dense urban-forest mosaic landscape. Herpetological Conservation and Biology. 2019; 14(1):143–154.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
