Animal board invited review: Opportunities and challenges in using GWP* to report the impact of ruminant livestock on global temperature change
- PMID: 37099893
- DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2023.100790
Animal board invited review: Opportunities and challenges in using GWP* to report the impact of ruminant livestock on global temperature change
Abstract
Ruminant livestock is a large contributor of CH4 emissions globally. Assessing how this CH4 and other greenhouse gases (GHG) from livestock contribute to anthropogenic climate change is key to understanding their role in achieving any temperature targets. The climate impacts of livestock, as well as other sectors or products/services, are generally expressed as CO2-equivalents using 100-year Global Warming Potentials (GWP100). However, the GWP100 cannot be used to translate emission pathways of short-lived climate pollutants (SLCPs) emissions to their temperature outcomes. A key limitation of handling long- and short-lived gases in the same manner is revealed in the context of any potential temperature stabilisation goals: to achieve this outcome, emissions of long-lived gases must decline to net-zero, but this is not the case for SLCPs. A recent alternative metric, GWP* (so-called 'GWP-star'), has been proposed to overcome these concerns. GWP* allows for simple appraisals of warming over time for emission series of different GHGs that may not be obvious if using pulse-emission metrics (i.e. GWP100). In this article, we explore some of the strengths and limitations of GWP* for reporting the contribution of ruminant livestock systems to global temperature change. A number of case studies are used to illustrate the potential use of the GWP* metric to, for example, understand the current contribution of different ruminant livestock production systems to global warming, appraise how different production systems or mitigations compare (having a temporal element), and seeing how possible emission pathways driven by changes in production, emissions intensity and gas composition show different impacts over time. We suggest that for some contexts, particularly if trying to directly infer contributions to additional warming, GWP* or similar approaches can provide important insight that would not be gained from conventional GWP100 reporting.
Keywords: Climate change; Global Warming; Greenhouse gas emissions; Methane; Net-zero.
Crown Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Retrospective and projected warming-equivalent emissions from global livestock and cattle calculated with an alternative climate metric denoted GWP.PLoS One. 2023 Oct 2;18(10):e0288341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288341. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37782671 Free PMC article.
-
Implementing an appropriate metric for the assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production: A national case study.Animal. 2022 Oct;16(10):100638. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2022.100638. Epub 2022 Sep 29. Animal. 2022. PMID: 36182718
-
Demonstrating GWP*: a means of reporting warming-equivalent emissions that captures the contrasting impacts of short- and longlived climate pollutants.Environ Res Lett. 2020 Apr 2;15(4):044023. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6d7e. Epub 2020 Jan 20. Environ Res Lett. 2020. PMID: 32395177 Free PMC article.
-
Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation).Waste Manag Res. 2008 Feb;26(1):11-32. doi: 10.1177/0734242X07088433. Waste Manag Res. 2008. PMID: 18338699 Review.
-
Methane emissions: choosing the right climate metric and time horizon.Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2018 Oct 17;20(10):1323-1339. doi: 10.1039/c8em00414e. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2018. PMID: 30255177 Review.
Cited by
-
Retrospective and projected warming-equivalent emissions from global livestock and cattle calculated with an alternative climate metric denoted GWP.PLoS One. 2023 Oct 2;18(10):e0288341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288341. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37782671 Free PMC article.
-
CO2 removal to reach net zero warming of global methane and nitrous oxide emissions of livestock: Comparison of two metrics under different 2050 FAO scenarios.PLoS One. 2025 Aug 18;20(8):e0330379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330379. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40824928 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources