Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul;22(4):652-655.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2023.04.007. Epub 2023 Apr 24.

Willingness of people with cystic fibrosis receiving elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) to participate in randomized modulator and inhaled antimicrobial clinical trials

Affiliations

Willingness of people with cystic fibrosis receiving elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) to participate in randomized modulator and inhaled antimicrobial clinical trials

D R VanDevanter et al. J Cyst Fibros. 2023 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the feasibility of enrolling people with CF (pwCF) taking the CFTR modulator elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) in clinical trials of a new modulator.

Methods: PwCF receiving ETI at CHEC-SC study (NCT03350828) enrollment were surveyed for interest in 2-week to 6-month placebo- (PC) and active-comparator (AC) modulator studies. Those taking inhaled antimicrobials (inhABX) were surveyed for interest in PC inhABX studies.

Results: Of 1791 respondents, 75% [95% CI 73, 77] would enroll in a 2-week PC modulator study versus 51% [49, 54] for a 6-month study; 82% [81, 84] and 63% [61, 65] would enroll in 2-week and 6 month AC studies; 77% [74, 80] of 551 taking inhABX would enroll in a 2-week PC inhABX study versus 59% [55, 63] for a 6-month study. Previous clinical trial experience increased willingness.

Conclusions: Study designs will affect feasibility of future clinical trials of new modulators and inhABX in people receiving ETI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no competing or conflicting interests to report.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Proportions of survey respondents willing to participate in clinical trials of different design.
Panel A, studies of a new CFTR modulator comparable to ETI of varying durations including 1:1 allocation to either an active (gray circles) or placebo (black circles) comparator. Panel B, 1:1 randomized placebo-controlled studies of varying durations of an inhaled antimicrobial. Respondent numbers are shown in parentheses. Bars are 95% confidence intervals.

Comment in

References

    1. Lopes-Pacheco M CFTR Modulators: The Changing Face of Cystic Fibrosis in the Era of Precision Medicine. Front Pharmacol. 2020. Feb 21;10:1662. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ridley K, Condren M. Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor: The First Triple-Combination Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Modulating Therapy. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2020;25(3):192–197. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Castellani C When triple therapy is not working: A reverse iceberg perspective. J Cyst Fibros. 2023. Mar; DOI:10.1016/j.jcf.2023.02.012, in press. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leonhardt K, Autry EB, Kuhn RJ, Wurth MA. CFTR modulator drug desensitization: Preserving the hope of long term improvement. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2021. Aug;56(8):2546–2552. - PubMed
    1. McGarry ME, Gibb ER, Laguna TA, O'Sullivan BP, Sawicki GS, Zobell JT. How many billions is enough? Prioritizing profits over patients with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2023. Feb 1. doi: 10.1002/ppul.26335. Epub ahead of print. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data