Exploring the psychometric properties of self-report instruments used to measure health-related quality of life and subjective wellbeing of adolescents with intellectual disabilities: A Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) systematic review
- PMID: 37101341
- DOI: 10.1111/jar.13110
Exploring the psychometric properties of self-report instruments used to measure health-related quality of life and subjective wellbeing of adolescents with intellectual disabilities: A Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) systematic review
Abstract
Background: Studies that have systematically reviewed the psychometric properties of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and subjective wellbeing instruments for adolescents with intellectual disabilities narrowly focus on disease or health-specific conditions. This review aimed to critically appraise the psychometric properties of self-report instruments used to measure HRQoL and subjective wellbeing of adolescents with intellectual disabilities.
Method: A systematic search was undertaken in four databases. The quality of the included studies and their psychometric properties was assessed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments Risk of Bias checklist.
Results: Seven studies reported psychometric properties of five different instruments. Only one instrument identified as having potential to be recommended for use but requires further validation research to assess its quality for this population.
Conclusions: There is insufficient evidence to support the recommendation of a self-report instrument to assess HRQoL and subjective wellbeing of adolescents with intellectual disabilities.
Keywords: adolescents; health-related quality of life; intellectual disability; psychometric properties; self-report measures; subjective wellbeing.
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Allerton, L. A., Welch, V., & Emerson, E. (2011). Health inequalities experienced by children and young people with intellectual disabilities: A review of literature from the United Kingdom. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 15(4), 269-278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744629511430772
-
- Altman, D. G. (1991). Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman and Hall.
-
- Boström, P., Åsberg, J., Thorson, M., & Broberg, M. (2016). Subjective mental health, peer relations, family, and school environment in adolescents with intellectual developmental disorder: A first report of a new questionnaire administered on tablet PCs. Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 9(4), 207-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/19315864.2016.1186254
-
- Bowling, A. (2011). Do older and younger people differ in their reported well-being? A national survey of adults in Britain. Family Practice, 28(2), 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmq082
-
- Brabcova, D., Krsek, P., Kohout, J., & Zarubova, J. (2014). Psychometric properties of the modified Czech version of the children self-report Quality-of-life Measure for Children with Epilepsy (CHEQOL-25). Epilepsy & Behavior, 33, 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.02.013
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
