Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 1;141(6):516-524.
doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.0937.

Biometric Risk Factors for Angle Closure Progression After Laser Peripheral Iridotomy

Affiliations

Biometric Risk Factors for Angle Closure Progression After Laser Peripheral Iridotomy

Yicheng K Bao et al. JAMA Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Importance: Laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) is the most common primary treatment for primary angle closure disease (PACD). However, there are sparse data guiding the longitudinal care of PAC suspect (PACS) eyes after LPI.

Objective: To elucidate the anatomic effects of LPI that are associated with a protective outcome against progression from PACS to PAC and acute angle closure (AAC) and to identify biometric factors that predict progression after LPI.

Design, setting, and participants: This was a retrospective analysis of data from the Zhongshan Angle Closure Prevention (ZAP) trial, a study of mainland Chinese people aged 50 to 70 years with bilateral PACS who received LPI in 1 randomly selected eye. Gonioscopy and anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) imaging were performed 2 weeks after LPI. Progression was defined as the development of PAC or an acute angle closure (AAC) attack. Cohort A included a random mix of treated and untreated eyes, and cohort B included only eyes treated with LPI. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were developed to assess biometric risk factors for progression in cohorts A and B. Data were analyzed from January 4 to December 22, 2022.

Main outcome and measure: Six-year progression to PAC or AAC.

Results: Cohort A included 878 eyes from 878 participants (mean [SD] age, 58.9 [5.0] years; 726 female [82.7%]) of whom 44 experienced progressive disease. In a multivariable analysis, treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.34-1.33; P = .25) was no longer associated with progression after adjusting for age and trabecular iris space area at 500 μm (TISA at 500 μm) at the 2-week visit. Cohort B included 869 treated eyes from 869 participants (mean [SD] age, 58.9 [5.0] years; 717 female [82.5%]) of whom 19 experienced progressive disease. In multivariable analysis, TISA at 500 μm (HR, 1.33 per 0.01 mm2 smaller; 95% CI, 1.12-1.56; P = .001) and cumulative gonioscopy score (HR, 1.25 per grade smaller; 95% CI, 1.03-1.52; P = .02) at the 2-week visit were associated with progression. Persistent angle narrowing on AS-OCT (TISA at 500 μm ≤0.05 mm2; HR, 9.41; 95% CI, 3.39-26.08; P <.001) or gonioscopy (cumulative score ≤6; HR, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.13-6.93; P =.04) conferred higher risk of progression.

Conclusions and relevance: Study results suggest that persistent angle narrowing detected by AS-OCT or cumulative gonioscopy score was predictive of disease progression in PACS eyes after LPI. These findings suggest that AS-OCT and gonioscopy may be performed to identify patients at high risk of developing angle closure who may benefit from closer monitoring despite patent LPI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Comment in

References

    1. Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(11):2081-2090. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. George R, Panda S, Vijaya L. Blindness in glaucoma: primary open-angle glaucoma vs primary angle-closure glaucoma-a meta-analysis. Eye (Lond). 2022;36(11):2099-2105. doi:10.1038/s41433-021-01802-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murgoitio-Esandi J, Xu BY, Song BJ, Zhou Q, Oberai AA. A mechanistic model of aqueous humor flow to study effects of angle closure on intraocular pressure. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023;12(1):16. doi:10.1167/tvst.12.1.16 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(2):238-242. doi:10.1136/bjo.86.2.238 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gedde SJ, Chen PP, Muir KW, et al. ; American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern Glaucoma Panel . Primary angle-closure disease Preferred Practice Pattern®. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(1):30-P70. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.10.021 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types