Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 1;102(11):1008-1013.
doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002267. Epub 2023 Apr 24.

Analysis of Adverse Effects of Cryoneurolysis for the Treatment of Spasticity

Affiliations

Analysis of Adverse Effects of Cryoneurolysis for the Treatment of Spasticity

Paul Winston et al. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. .

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study is to report adverse effects from clinical studies on ultrasound-guided percutaneous cryoneurolysis for spasticity.

Design: Patients were prospectively enrolled in three studies at a single institution. Cryoneurolysis was performed to primarily motor nerve branches (medial and lateral pectoral, musculocutaneous, radial, median, ulnar, tibial, obturator) and mixed motor sensory nerve trunks (median, ulnar, suprascapular, radial, and tibial).

Results: Cryoneurolysis was performed for 277 nerves (99 mixed motor sensory), on 113 patients (59 F, 54 M, average age 54.4 yrs). One patient had a local skin infection and two patients had bruising or swelling; all resolved within 1 mo. Nine reported nerve pain or dysesthesia (two motor, seven mixed motor sensory nerves). Four received no treatment, four oral or topical medications, two perineural injections, one botulinum toxin. Three patients' symptoms remained until 3 mos and one had numbness at six. One patient had botulinum toxin injections for cramping. All had at minimum 3-mo follow-up; seven withdrew (x̄ = 5.4 mos), four passed away. None of these 11 reported adverse effects.

Conclusions: A total of 96.75% of nerve treatments had no pain or dysesthesias beyond treatment. Few had pain or numbness beyond 3 mos. Cryoneurolysis has potential to be a safe spasticity treatment with manageable adverse effects.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04670783.

Keywords: Adverse Effects; Cryoneurolysis; Nerve Block; Safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial disclosure statements have been obtained, and no conflicts of interest have been reported by the authors or by any individuals in control of the content of this article.

References

    1. Pandyan A, Gregoric M, Barnes M, et al.: Spasticity: clinical perceptions, neurological realities and meaningful measurement. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:2–6
    1. Sheean G: The pathophysiology of spasticity. Eur J Neurol 2002;9(suppl 1):3–9
    1. Rubenstein J, Harvey AW, Vincent D, et al.: Cryoneurotomy to reduce spasticity and improve range of motion in spastic flexed elbow: a visual vignette. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2021;100:e65
    1. Scobie J, Winston P: Case report: perspective of a caregiver on functional outcomes following bilateral lateral pectoral nerve cryoneurotomy to treat spasticity in a pediatric patient with cerebral palsy. Front Rehabil Sci 2021;2:719054
    1. Winston P, Mills PB, Reebye R, et al.: Cryoneurotomy as a percutaneous mini-invasive therapy for the treatment of the spastic limb: case presentation, review of the literature, and proposed approach for use. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl 2019;1:100030

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources