Prevalence and mean number of teeth with amalgam and nonamalgam restorations, United States, 2015 through 2018
- PMID: 37105669
- PMCID: PMC10985832
- DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2023.02.016
Prevalence and mean number of teeth with amalgam and nonamalgam restorations, United States, 2015 through 2018
Abstract
Background: Amalgam has been used for more than 150 years as a safe and reliable restorative material. The authors described the occurrence of amalgam and nonamalgam restorations in the United States in primary and permanent teeth across age groups and according to sociodemographic characteristics.
Methods: The authors used clinical examination data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2015-2018 for participants 2 years and older (n = 17,040). The authors estimated the prevalence and mean number of amalgam and nonamalgam restorations in primary and permanent teeth according to age groups (2-5 years, 6-11 years, 12-15 years, 16-19 years, 20-39 years, 40-59 years, 60-79 years, and ≥ 80 years), race and ethnicity, federal poverty guideline, education, and pregnancy status.
Results: The prevalence of amalgam restorations ranged from 4% through 69%. Overall, amalgam restorations were more prevalent in children and adolescents from racial and ethnic minority groups and families at lower poverty levels and with lower education. The mean number of teeth with nonamalgam restorations was higher than those with amalgam restorations in primary teeth of children aged 6 through 11 years, permanent teeth of those 12 through 15 years and 20 through 39 years, and women aged 20 through 49 years, regardless of pregnancy status. The mean number of amalgam restorations was higher than that for nonamalgam restorations in older age groups.
Conclusions: Nonamalgam restorations were the most common in the primary teeth of children older than 5 years and in the permanent teeth of adults younger than 40 years. Amalgam restorations were more common in older adults. Amalgam and nonamalgam restorations were equally common in children younger than 5 years.
Practical implications: The study findings suggest a shift from amalgam to alternative restorative materials in the United States.
Keywords: Dental restorations; composites; dental amalgam.
Copyright © 2023 American Dental Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Dental amalgam restorations in nationally representative sample of US population aged ≥15 years: NHANES 2011-2016.J Public Health Dent. 2021 Dec;81(4):327-330. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12456. Epub 2021 May 5. J Public Health Dent. 2021. PMID: 33954994 Free PMC article.
-
A 24-month evaluation of amalgam and resin-based composite restorations: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Jun;144(6):583-93. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0169. J Am Dent Assoc. 2013. PMID: 23729455 Free PMC article.
-
The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings From the New England Children's Amalgam Trial.J Am Dent Assoc. 2007 Jun;138(6):763-72. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0264. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007. PMID: 17545265 Clinical Trial.
-
The safe and effective use of dental amalgam.Int Dent J. 1987 Sep;37(3):147-51. Int Dent J. 1987. PMID: 3316042 Review.
-
Amalgam--Resurrection and redemption. Part 1: the clinical and legal mythology of anti-amalgam.Quintessence Int. 2001 Jul-Aug;32(7):525-35. Quintessence Int. 2001. PMID: 11495565 Review.
Cited by
-
Survival Rates of Amalgam and Composite Resin Restorations from Big Data Real-Life Databases in the Era of Restricted Dental Mercury Use.Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Jun 7;11(6):579. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11060579. Bioengineering (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38927815 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Oral health surveillance report: trends in dental caries and sealants, tooth retention, and edentulism—United States 1999–2004 to 2011–2016. Division of Oral Health. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2019. Accessed March 21, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/oralhealth/publications/OHSR-2019-index.html
-
- Bayne SC, Ferracane JL, Marshall GW, Marshall SJ, van Noort R. The evolution of dental materials over the past century: silver and gold to tooth color and beyond. J Dent Res. 2019;98(3):257–265. - PubMed
-
- Jackson RD. Class II composite resin restorations: faster, easier, predictable. Br Dent J. 2016;221(10):623–631. - PubMed
-
- Chandrapal A Practical application of composite resin techniques in the posterior dentition. Br Dent J. 2016;220(5):271–272. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources