Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 27;73(730):e374-e383.
doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0398. Print 2023 May.

The impact of remote care approaches on continuity in primary care: a mixed-studies systematic review

Affiliations

The impact of remote care approaches on continuity in primary care: a mixed-studies systematic review

Emma Ladds et al. Br J Gen Pract. .

Abstract

Background: The value of continuity in primary care has been demonstrated for multiple positive outcomes. However, little is known about how the expansion of remote and digital care models in primary care have impacted continuity.

Aim: To explore the impact of the expansion of remote and digital care models on continuity in primary care.

Design and setting: A systematic review of continuity in primary care.

Method: A keyword search of Embase, MEDLINE, and CINAHL databases was used along with snowball sampling to identify relevant English-language qualitative and quantitative studies from any country between 2000 and 2022, which explored remote or digital approaches in primary care and continuity. Relevant data were extracted, analysed using GRADE-CERQual, and narratively synthesised.

Results: Fifteen studies were included in the review. The specific impact of remote approaches on continuity was rarely overtly addressed. Some patients expressed a preference for relational continuity depending on circumstance, problem, and context; others prioritised access. Clinicians valued continuity, with some viewing remote consultations more suitable where there was high episodic or relational continuity. With lower continuity, patients and clinicians considered remote consultations harder, higher risk, and poorer quality. Some evidence suggested that remote approaches and/or their implementation risked worsening inequalities and causing harm by reducing continuity where it was valuable. However, if deployed strategically and flexibly, remote approaches could improve continuity.

Conclusion: While the value of continuity in primary care has previously been well demonstrated, the dearth of evidence around continuity in a remote and digital context is troubling. Further research is, therefore, needed to explore the links between the shift to remote care, continuity and equity, using real-world evaluation frameworks to ascertain when and for whom continuity adds most value, and how this can be enabled or maintained.

Keywords: consultation; continuity of care; primary care; remote consultation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared no competing interests.

Figures

Figure S1.
Figure S1.
PRISMA flow diagram.

References

    1. Donaldson MS, Vanselow NA. The nature of primary care. J Fam Pract. 1996;42(2):113–116. - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine . A manpower policy for primary health care: report of a study. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1978.
    1. Starfield B. Primary care: balancing health needs, services, and technology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998.
    1. Jimenez G, Matchar D, Koh GCH, et al. Revisiting the four core functions (4Cs) of primary care: operational definitions and complexities. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2021;22:e68. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization . International Conference on Primary Health Care, Alma-Ata. USSR; 1978. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/documents/almaata-declarat... (accessed 24 Jan 2023).

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources