Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Apr 21;10(4):497.
doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10040497.

A Review of Biomechanical and Physiological Effects of Using Poles in Sports

Affiliations
Review

A Review of Biomechanical and Physiological Effects of Using Poles in Sports

Maximilian Saller et al. Bioengineering (Basel). .

Abstract

The use of poles in sports, to support propulsion, is an integral and inherent component of some sports disciplines such as skiing (cross-country and roller), Nordic walking, and trail running. The aim of this review is to summarize the current state-of-the-art of literature on multiple influencing factors of poles in terms of biomechanical and physiological effects. We evaluated publications in the subfields of biomechanics, physiology, coordination, and pole properties. Plantar pressure and ground reaction forces decreased with the use of poles in all included studies. The upper body and trunk muscles were more active. The lower body muscles were either less active or no different from walking without poles. The use of poles led to a higher oxygen consumption (VO2) without increasing the level of perceived exertion (RPE). Furthermore, the heart rate (HR) tended to be higher. Longer poles reduced the VO2 and provided a longer thrust phase and greater propulsive impulse. The mass of the poles showed no major influence on VO2, RPE, or HR. Solely the activity of the biceps brachii increased with the pole mass.

Keywords: biomechanics; coordination; physiological parameters; pole properties; poles; running; skiing; walking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Strategy of the literature review process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Summary of pole-induced effects on the human body; ↓ = decrease, ↑ = increase, ⟂ = no change.

References

    1. Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D.G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Br. Med. J. 2009;339:b2535. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2535. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liberati A., Altman D.G., Tetzlaff J., Mulrow C., Gøtzsche P.C., Ioannidis J.P., Clarke M., Devereaux P.J., Kleijnen J., Moher D. The Prisma statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2009;62:e1–e34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Daviaux Y., Hintzy F., Samozino P., Horvais N. Effect of using poles on foot–ground kinetics during stance phase in trail running. Eur. J. Sport. Sci. 2013;13:468–474. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2012.740505. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Willson J., Torry Decker M.J., Kernozek T., Steadman J.R. Effects of walking poles on lower extremity gait mechanics. Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc. 2001;33:142–147. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200101000-00021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Park S.K., Yang D.J., Kang Y.H., Kim J.H., Uhm Y.H., Lee Y.S. Effects of Nordic walking and walking on spatiotemporal gait parameters and ground reaction force. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2015;27:2891–2893. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.2891. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources