Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Apr 14;20(8):5520.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph20085520.

Scoliosis Management through Apps and Software Tools

Affiliations
Review

Scoliosis Management through Apps and Software Tools

Lorella Bottino et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Scoliosis is curvature of the spine, often found in adolescents, which can impact on quality of life. Generally, scoliosis is diagnosed by measuring the Cobb angle, which represents the gold standard for scoliosis grade quantification. Commonly, scoliosis evaluation is conducted in person by medical professionals using traditional methods (i.e., involving a scoliometer and/or X-ray radiographs). In recent years, as has happened in various medicine disciplines, it is possible also in orthopedics to observe the spread of Information and Communications Technology (ICT) solutions (i.e., software-based approaches). As an example, smartphone applications (apps) and web-based applications may help the doctors in screening and monitoring scoliosis, thereby reducing the number of in-person visits. Objectives: This paper aims to provide an overview of the main features of the most popular scoliosis ICT tools, i.e., apps and web-based applications for scoliosis diagnosis, screening, and monitoring. Several apps are assessed and compared with the aim of providing a valid starting point for doctors and patients in their choice of software-based tools. Benefits for the patients may be: reducing the number of visits to the doctor, self-monitoring of scoliosis. Benefits for the doctors may be: monitoring the scoliosis progression over time, managing several patients in a remote way, mining the data of several patients for evaluating different therapeutic or exercise prescriptions. Materials and Methods: We first propose a methodology for the evaluation of scoliosis apps in which five macro-categories are considered: (i) technological aspects (e.g., available sensors, how angles are measured); (ii) the type of measurements (e.g., Cobb angle, angle of trunk rotation, axial vertebral rotation); (iii) availability (e.g., app store and eventual fee to pay); (iv) the functions offered to the user (e.g., posture monitoring, exercise prescription); (v) overall evaluation (e.g., pros and cons, usability). Then, six apps and one web-based application are described and evaluated using this methodology. Results: The results for assessment of scoliosis apps are shown in a tabular format for ease of understanding and intuitive comparison, which can help the doctors, specialists, and families in their choice of scoliosis apps. Conclusions: The use of ICT solutions for spinal curvature assessment and monitoring brings several advantages to both patients and orthopedics specialists. Six scoliosis apps and one web-based application are evaluated, and a guideline for their selection is provided.

Keywords: Cobb angle; angle of trunk rotation (ATR); app; axial vertebral rotation (AVR); scoliometer; scoliosis; scoliosis management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Quantification of scoliosis grade using the Cobb angle.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Workflow and reference architecture of ICT-based scoliosis management solutions.
Figure 3
Figure 3
ScolioTrack. (This figure is a snapshot taken by the screen of the app).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Scoliometer. (This figure is a snapshot taken by the screen of the app).
Figure 5
Figure 5
APECS. (This figure is a snapshot taken by the screen of the app).
Figure 6
Figure 6
CobbMeter. (This figure is a snapshot taken by the screen of the app).
Figure 7
Figure 7
ScolioDetector. (This figure is a snapshot taken by the screen of the app).
Figure 8
Figure 8
Scoliosis Tracker. (This figure is a snapshot taken by the screen of the app).
Figure 9
Figure 9
Tool assessment with respect to “Wealth of functionality” and “User-friendliness” dimensions.

References

    1. Choudhry M.N., Ahmad Z., Verma R. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Open Orthop. J. 2016;10:143. doi: 10.2174/1874325001610010143. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Trobisch P., Suess O., Schwab F. Idiopathic scoliosis. Dtsch. Ärzteblatt Int. 2010;107:875. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0875. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang J., Zhang J., Xu R., Chen T.G., Zhou K.S., Zhang H.H. Measurement of scoliosis Cobb angle by end vertebra tilt angle method. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2018;13:223. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0928-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maggio D., Ailon T., Kelleher J., Ames C., Shaffrey C., Smith J. Youmans and Winn Neurological Surgery. 7th ed. Elsevier; Philadelphia, PA, USA: 2017. Evaluation and treatment of adult scoliosis and sagittal plane deformity.
    1. Greiner A.K. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Radiologic decision-making. Am. Fam. Physician. 2002;65:1817. - PubMed

Publication types