COVID-19: Factors Associated with the Psychological Distress, Fear and Resilient Coping Strategies among Community Members in Saudi Arabia
- PMID: 37108018
- PMCID: PMC10138665
- DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11081184
COVID-19: Factors Associated with the Psychological Distress, Fear and Resilient Coping Strategies among Community Members in Saudi Arabia
Abstract
(1) Background: COVID-19 caused the worst international public health crisis, accompanied by major global economic downturns and mass-scale job losses, which impacted the psychosocial wellbeing of the worldwide population, including Saudi Arabia. Evidence of the high-risk groups impacted by the pandemic has been non-existent in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, this study examined factors associated with psychosocial distress, fear of COVID-19 and coping strategies among the general population in Saudi Arabia. (2) Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in healthcare and community settings in the Saudi Arabia using an anonymous online questionnaire. The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-10), Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) and Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS) were used to assess psychological distress, fear and coping strategies, respectively. Multivariate logistic regressions were used, and an Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) was reported. (3) Results: Among 803 participants, 70% (n = 556) were females, and the median age was 27 years; 35% (n = 278) were frontline or essential service workers; and 24% (n = 195) reported comorbid conditions including mental health illness. Of the respondents, 175 (21.8%) and 207 (25.8%) reported high and very high psychological distress, respectively. Factors associated with moderate to high levels of psychological distress were: youth, females, non-Saudi nationals, those experiencing a change in employment or a negative financial impact, having comorbidities, and current smoking. A high level of fear was reported by 89 participants (11.1%), and this was associated with being ex-smokers (3.72, 1.14-12.14, 0.029) and changes in employment (3.42, 1.91-6.11, 0.000). A high resilience was reported by 115 participants (14.3%), and 333 participants (41.5%) had medium resilience. Financial impact and contact with known/suspected cases (1.63, 1.12-2.38, 0.011) were associated with low, medium, to high resilient coping. (4) Conclusions: People in Saudi Arabia were at a higher risk of psychosocial distress along with medium-high resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic, warranting urgent attention from healthcare providers and policymakers to provide specific mental health support strategies for their current wellbeing and to avoid a post-pandemic mental health crisis.
Keywords: COVID-19; community; coping; mental health; psychological distress; resilience.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Factors associated with psychological distress, fear and coping strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia.Global Health. 2020 Oct 8;16(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00624-w. Global Health. 2020. PMID: 33032629 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19: Psychological distress, fear, and coping strategies among community members across the United Arab Emirates.PLoS One. 2023 Mar 29;18(3):e0282479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282479. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 36989272 Free PMC article.
-
Psychological Distress, Fear and Coping Strategies During the Second and Third Waves of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Southern Germany.Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 25;13:860683. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.860683. eCollection 2022. Front Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 35546957 Free PMC article.
-
Review of the Psychological Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Healthcare Workers in Saudi Arabia.Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Oct 1;14:4105-4111. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S324938. eCollection 2021. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021. PMID: 34629915 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Review Study on the Trends of Psychological Challenges, Coping Ways, and Public Support During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Vulnerable Populations in the United States.Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 7;13:920581. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.920581. eCollection 2022. Front Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 35873246 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of road traffic injuries in the post-pandemic era: a two-and-a-half-year review of clinical characteristics and outcomes at a major trauma center.Int J Emerg Med. 2025 Apr 29;18(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12245-025-00817-3. Int J Emerg Med. 2025. PMID: 40301764 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of COVID-19-Associated Fear, Stress and Level of Social Support in Development of Suicidality in Patients Diagnosed with Affective and Stress-Induced Psychiatric Disorders during the COVID-19 Pandemic-A Comparative Analysis.Brain Sci. 2023 May 17;13(5):812. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13050812. Brain Sci. 2023. PMID: 37239284 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the relationship between personal and cohabiting family members' COVID-19 infection experiences and fear of COVID-19: a longitudinal study based on the Japan COVID-19 and Society Internet Survey (JACSIS).BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 20;14(12):e087595. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087595. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39806713 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organization WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. 2021. [(accessed on 31 March 2021)]. Available online: https://covid19.who.int.
-
- Kola L., Kohrt B.A., Hanlon C., Naslund J.A., Sikander S., Balaji M., Benjet C., Cheung E.Y.L., Eaton J., Gonsalves P., et al. COVID-19 mental health impact and responses in low-income and middle-income countries: Reimagining global mental health. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8:535–550. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00025-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials