Patellofemoral Arthroplasty Is an Efficient Strategy for Isolated Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis with or without Robotic-Assisted System
- PMID: 37109011
- PMCID: PMC10142406
- DOI: 10.3390/jpm13040625
Patellofemoral Arthroplasty Is an Efficient Strategy for Isolated Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis with or without Robotic-Assisted System
Abstract
There is relative paucity in the literature concerning outcomes after robotic-assisted Patellofemoral Arthroplasty (PFA). The aims were (1) to evaluate outcomes in patients undergoing PFA with inlay or onlay components, with or without robotic arm assistance and (2) to identify risk factors of poor outcomes after PFA. This retrospective study included 77 PFA for isolated patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis, assigned to three groups (18 conventional technique, 17 image-free robotic-assisted system and 42 image-based robotic-assisted system). The demographic data were comparable between the three groups. The clinical outcomes assessed were: Visual Analogue Scale, Knee Society Score, Kujala score and satisfaction rate. The radiological measures were: Caton Deschamps index, patellar tilt and frontal alignment of the trochlea. Functional outcomes, satisfaction rate and residual pain were comparable between the three groups. Patellar tilt improvement was superior when a robotic device was used (either image-based or image-free) compared to the conventional technique. There were three revisions (3.9%) at the last follow-up related to femorotibial osteoarthritis progression. Multivariate analysis found no significant risk factors for poor outcomes, with respect to the surgical technique or implant design. Functional outcomes and revisions rate after PFA were comparable between the surgical techniques and implants. Robotic-assisted systems were associated with a superior improvement of the patellar tilt compared to the conventional technique.
Keywords: functional outcomes; inlay; onlay; patellar tilt; patellofemoral arthroplasty; revision; robotic arm assisted surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
C.B., C.V.-C. and A.F.: The authors declare no conflict of interest. P.P.: Consultant for Stryker Education. F.L.: Consultant for Stryker Education. E.S.: Consultant for Corin. Institutional research support from Corin, Amplitude. S.L.: Royalties from Smith Nephew and Stryker. Consultant for Stryker, Smith Nephew, Heraeus, Depuy Synthes, Groupe Lepine; Institutional research support from Corin, Amplitude; Editorial Board for Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Am).
Figures
References
-
- Dejour D., Saffarini M., Malemo Y., Pungitore M., Valluy J., Nover L., Demey G. Early outcomes of an anatomic trochlear-cutting patellofemoral arthroplasty: Patient selection is key. Knee Surg. Sport. Traumatol. Arthrosc. Off. J. ESSKA. 2019;27:2297–2302. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05368-8. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Feucht M.J., Cotic M., Beitzel K., Baldini J.F., Meidinger G., Schottle P.B., Imhoff A.B. A matched-pair comparison of inlay and onlay trochlear designs for patellofemoral arthroplasty: No differences in clinical outcome but less progression of osteoarthritis with inlay designs. Knee Surg. Sport. Traumatol. Arthrosc. Off. J. ESSKA. 2017;25:2784–2791. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3733-2. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
