Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 17;12(8):2904.
doi: 10.3390/jcm12082904.

Minimally Invasive Donors Right Hepatectomy versus Open Donors Right Hepatectomy: A Meta-Analysis

Affiliations

Minimally Invasive Donors Right Hepatectomy versus Open Donors Right Hepatectomy: A Meta-Analysis

Chunyang Mu et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Background: How to obtain a donor liver remains an open issue, especially in the choice of minimally invasive donors right hepatectomy versus open donors right hepatectomy (MIDRH versus ODRH). We conducted a meta-analysis to clarify this question.

Methods: A meta-analysis was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes were analyzed.

Results: A total of 24 retrospective studies were identified. For MIDRH vs. ODRH, the operative time was longer in the MIDRH group (mean difference [MD] = 30.77 min; p = 0.006). MIDRH resulted in significantly less intraoperative blood loss (MD = -57.86 mL; p < 0.00001), shorter length of stay (MD = -1.22 days; p < 0.00001), lower pulmonary (OR = 0.55; p = 0.002) and wound complications (OR = 0.45; p = 0.0007), lower overall complications (OR = 0.79; p = 0.02), and less self-infused morphine consumption (MD = -0.06 days; 95% CI, -1.16 to -0.05; p = 0.03). In the subgroup analysis, similar results were observed in pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH) and the propensity score matching group. In addition, there were no significant differences in post-operation liver injury, bile duct complications, Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 III, readmission, reoperation, and postoperative transfusion between the MIDRH and ODRH groups.

Discussion: We concluded that MIDRH is a safe and feasible alternative to ODRH for living donators, especially in the PLDRH group.

Keywords: laparoscopic; laparoscopic-assisted; liver transplantation; meta-analysis; open living donor resection; right living donor resection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of study identification and selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of comparison of MIDRH versus ODRH for age [4,5,6,7,12,13,14,15,16,17,19,20,21,22,23,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. *: Different data in the same article.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot of comparison of MIDRH versus ODRH for gender [1,4,5,6,7,12,13,14,15,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,29,30,31]. *: Different data in the same article.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot comparison of MIDRH versus ODRH for intraoperative blood loss [4,5,6,7,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. *: Different data in the same article.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forest plot comparison of MIDRH versus ODRH for operative time [4,5,7,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. *: Different data in the same article. *: Different data in the same article.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Forest plot and funnel plot comparison of MIDRH versus ODRH for length of hospital stay [4,5,7,12,13,14,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,27,29,30,31]. *: Different data in the same article.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Forest plot comparison of MIDRH versus ODRH for pulmonary complications [4,5,12,13,14,15,16,17,19,20,21,22,24,26,27,30]. *: Different data in the same article.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Forest plot comparison of MIDRH versus ODRH for postoperative transfusion [5,12,15,19,20,21,25,29]. *: Different data in the same article.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Forest plot and funnel plot comparison of MIDRH versus ODRH for wound complication [4,5,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,30,31]. *: Different data in the same article.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Forest plot and funnel plot comparison of MIDRH versus ODRH for overall complications [4,5,7,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,29,30,31]. *: Different data in the same article.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Forest plot and funnel plot comparison of MIDRH versus ODRH for self-infused morphine pump (days) [12,16,19,21].

References

    1. Lo C.-M., Fan S.T., Liu C.L., Yong B.H., Wong Y., Lau G.K., Lai C.L., Ng I.O., Wong J. Lessons Learned from One Hundred Right Lobe Living Donor Liver Transplants. Ann. Surg. 2004;240:151–158. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000129340.05238.a0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cherqui D., Ciria R., Kwon C.H.D., Kim K.-H., Broering D., Wakabayashi G., Samstein B., Troisi R., Han H.S., Rotellar F., et al. Expert Consensus Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Donor Hepatectomy for Living Donor Liver Transplantation from Innovation to Implementation: A Joint Initiative from the International Laparoscopic Liver Society (ILLS) and the Asian-Pacific Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (A-PHPBA) Ann. Surg. 2021;273:96–108. - PubMed
    1. Soubrane O., Perdigao Cotta F., Scatton O. Pure laparoscopic right hepatectomy in a living donor. Am. J. Transplant. 2013;13:2467–2471. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12361. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Han E.S., Lee K.-W., Suh K.-S., Yi N.-J., Choi Y., Hong S.K., Lee J.-M., Hong K.P., Hong S.Y., Suh S. Shorter operation time and improved surgical outcomes in laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy compared with open donor right hepatectomy. Surgery. 2021;170:1822–1829. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.06.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lapisatepun W., Junrungsee S., Chotirosniramit A., Udomsin K., Lapisatepun W., Chanthima P., Boonsri S., Lorsomradee S. Comparative outcomes of pure laparoscopic and open donor right hepatectomy: The first report from a Southeast Asian transplant center. BMC Surg. 2022;22:1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01507-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources