Minimally Invasive Donors Right Hepatectomy versus Open Donors Right Hepatectomy: A Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 37109241
- PMCID: PMC10146341
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm12082904
Minimally Invasive Donors Right Hepatectomy versus Open Donors Right Hepatectomy: A Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background: How to obtain a donor liver remains an open issue, especially in the choice of minimally invasive donors right hepatectomy versus open donors right hepatectomy (MIDRH versus ODRH). We conducted a meta-analysis to clarify this question.
Methods: A meta-analysis was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes were analyzed.
Results: A total of 24 retrospective studies were identified. For MIDRH vs. ODRH, the operative time was longer in the MIDRH group (mean difference [MD] = 30.77 min; p = 0.006). MIDRH resulted in significantly less intraoperative blood loss (MD = -57.86 mL; p < 0.00001), shorter length of stay (MD = -1.22 days; p < 0.00001), lower pulmonary (OR = 0.55; p = 0.002) and wound complications (OR = 0.45; p = 0.0007), lower overall complications (OR = 0.79; p = 0.02), and less self-infused morphine consumption (MD = -0.06 days; 95% CI, -1.16 to -0.05; p = 0.03). In the subgroup analysis, similar results were observed in pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH) and the propensity score matching group. In addition, there were no significant differences in post-operation liver injury, bile duct complications, Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 III, readmission, reoperation, and postoperative transfusion between the MIDRH and ODRH groups.
Discussion: We concluded that MIDRH is a safe and feasible alternative to ODRH for living donators, especially in the PLDRH group.
Keywords: laparoscopic; laparoscopic-assisted; liver transplantation; meta-analysis; open living donor resection; right living donor resection.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Cherqui D., Ciria R., Kwon C.H.D., Kim K.-H., Broering D., Wakabayashi G., Samstein B., Troisi R., Han H.S., Rotellar F., et al. Expert Consensus Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Donor Hepatectomy for Living Donor Liver Transplantation from Innovation to Implementation: A Joint Initiative from the International Laparoscopic Liver Society (ILLS) and the Asian-Pacific Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (A-PHPBA) Ann. Surg. 2021;273:96–108. - PubMed
-
- Han E.S., Lee K.-W., Suh K.-S., Yi N.-J., Choi Y., Hong S.K., Lee J.-M., Hong K.P., Hong S.Y., Suh S. Shorter operation time and improved surgical outcomes in laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy compared with open donor right hepatectomy. Surgery. 2021;170:1822–1829. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.06.005. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lapisatepun W., Junrungsee S., Chotirosniramit A., Udomsin K., Lapisatepun W., Chanthima P., Boonsri S., Lorsomradee S. Comparative outcomes of pure laparoscopic and open donor right hepatectomy: The first report from a Southeast Asian transplant center. BMC Surg. 2022;22:1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01507-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
