Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 20;12(8):3010.
doi: 10.3390/jcm12083010.

How Can We Best Measure Frailty in Cardiosurgical Patients?

Affiliations

How Can We Best Measure Frailty in Cardiosurgical Patients?

Magdalena L Laux et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Background: Frailty is gaining importance in cardiothoracic surgery and is a risk factor for adverse outcomes and mortality. Various frailty scores have since been developed, but there is no consensus which to use for cardiac surgery.

Methods: In an all-comer prospective study of patients presenting for cardiac surgery, we assessed frailty and analyzed complication rates in hospital and 1-year mortality, as well as laboratory markers before and after surgery.

Results: 246 included patients were analyzed. A total of 16 patients (6.5%) were frail, and 130 patients (52.85%) were pre-frail, summarized in the frail group (FRAIL) and compared to the non-frail patients (NON-FRAIL). The mean age was 66.5 ± 9.05 years, 21.14% female. The in-hospital mortality rate was 4.88% and the 1-year mortality rate was 6.1%. FRAIL patients stayed longer in hospital (FRAIL 15.53 ± 8.5 days vs. NON-FRAIL 13.71 ± 8.94 days, p = 0.004) and in intensive/intermediate care units (ITS/IMC) (FRAIL 5.4 ± 4.33 days vs. NON-FRAIL 4.86 ± 4.78 days, p = 0.014). The 6 min walk (6 MW) (317.92 ± 94.17 m vs. 387.08 ± 93.43 m, p = 0.006), mini mental status (MMS) (25.72 ± 4.36 vs. 27.71 ± 1.9, p = 0.048) and clinical frail scale (3.65 ± 1.32 vs. 2.82 ± 0.86, p = 0.005) scores differed between patients who died within the first year after surgery compared to those who survived this period. In-hospital stay correlated with timed up-and-go (TUG) (TAU: 0.094, p = 0.037), Barthel index (TAU-0.114, p = 0.032), hand grip strength (TAU-0.173, p < 0.001), and EuroSCORE II (TAU 0.119, p = 0.008). ICU/IMC stay duration correlated with TUG (TAU 0.186, p < 0.001), 6 MW (TAU-0.149, p = 0.002), and hand grip strength (TAU-0.22, p < 0.001). FRAIL patients had post-operatively altered levels of plasma-redox-biomarkers and fat-soluble micronutrients.

Conclusions: frailty parameters with the highest predictive value as well as ease of use could be added to the EuroSCORE.

Keywords: cardiosurgery; frailty; outcome; risk score.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a,b) Hospitalization and ICU/IMC stay. In-hospital stay: FRAIL 15.53 ± 8.5 days vs. NON-FRAIL 13.71 ± 8.94 days, p = 0.004, and duration of intensive care treatment including intermediate care: FRAIL 5.4 ± 4.33 days vs. 4.86 ± 4.78 days NON-FRAIL, p = 0.014. IMC = intermediate care, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(ac) Mobility/muscle strength tests. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(ac) Plasma redox biomarkers. ** p < 0.01.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(ah): Fat-soluble micronutrients. *** p < 0.001.

References

    1. Deutscher Herzbericht German Heart Report. 2021. [(accessed on 3 September 2022)]. Available online: https://epaper.herzstiftung.de/#0.
    1. Antonazzo B., Biondi-Zoccai G., Marullo A.G.M., Frati G., Ronzoni S., Chiariello G.A., Versaci F., Giordano A. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the elderly: An umbrella review. Vessel. Plus. 2020;4:3. doi: 10.20517/2574-1209.2019.33. - DOI
    1. Ferrante L.E., Pisani M.A., Murphy T.E., Gahbauer E.A., Leo-Summers L.S., Gill T.M. The Association of Frailty with Post-ICU Disability, Nursing Home Admission, and Mortality. Chest. 2018;153:1378–1386. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.03.007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sprung C.L., Artigas A., Kesecioglu J., Pezzi A., Wiis J., Pirracchio R., Baras M., Edbrooke D.L., Pesenti A., Bakker J., et al. The Eldicus prospective, observational study of triage decision making in European intensive care units. Part II. Crit. Care Med. 2012;40:132–138. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232d6b0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bagshaw S.M., Stelfox H.T., McDermid R.C., Rolfson D.B., Tsuyuki R.T., Baig N., Artiuch B., Ibrahim Q., Stollery D.E., Rokosh E., et al. Association between frailty and short- and long-term outcomes among critically ill patients: A multicentre prospective cohort study. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2013;186:E95–E102. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.130639. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources