Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 14;59(4):761.
doi: 10.3390/medicina59040761.

Treatment of Cesarean Scar and Cervical Pregnancies Using the Ovum Aspiration Set for Intrachorial Methotrexate Injection as a Conservative, Fertility-Preserving Procedure

Affiliations

Treatment of Cesarean Scar and Cervical Pregnancies Using the Ovum Aspiration Set for Intrachorial Methotrexate Injection as a Conservative, Fertility-Preserving Procedure

Isabell Ge et al. Medicina (Kaunas). .

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Cesarean scar and cervical pregnancies are rare forms of ectopic pregnancies, occurring in 1 in 2000 and 1 in 9000 pregnancies, respectively. Both entities are medically challenging due to their high morbidity and mortality potential. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed all cesarean scar and cervical pregnancies from 2010 to 2019 in the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of the University Hospital Freiburg, treated with both intrachorial (using the ovum aspiration set) and systemic methotrexate application. Results: We identified seven patients with a cesarean scar and four patients with cervical pregnancies. At diagnosis, the median gestational age was 7 + 1 (range: 5 + 5-9 + 5) weeks and the mean value of ß-hCG was 43,536 (range: 5132-87842) mlU/mL. On average, one dose of intrachorial and two doses of systemic methotrexate were administered per patient. The efficacy rate was 72.7% with three patients (27.3%) needing an additional surgical or interventional procedure. The uterus was preserved in 100% of the patients. Out of the eight patients with follow-up data, five reported subsequent pregnancies (62.5%) that resulted in six live births. None had recurrent cesarean scars or cervical pregnancies. In the subgroup analyses, when comparing cesarean scar pregnancies to cervical pregnancies, patient characteristics, treatment modality, and the outcome did not differ significantly, except for parity (2 versus 0, p = 0.02) and the duration since the last pregnancy (3 vs. 0.75 years, p = 0.048). When comparing cases with successful and failed methotrexate-only treatments, the maternal age was significantly higher in the successful group (34 vs. 27 years, p = 0.02). Localization of the gestation, gestational and maternal age, ß-hCG, and history of preceding pregnancies were non-predictive for the efficacy of the treatment. Conclusions: The combined application of intrachorial and systemic methotrexate for the treatment of cesarean scar and cervical pregnancies has been proven effective, well-tolerated, organ- and fertility-conserving with a low complication rate.

Keywords: cervical pregnancy; cesarean scar pregnancy; ectopic pregnancy; fertility; intrachorial injection; methotrexate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Ultrasound image of a cesarean scar pregnancy before and after treatment with intrachorial and intramuscular methotrexate: (a) at initial diagnosis (11 + 1 gestational weeks); (b) 4 months after treatment with methotrexate.

References

    1. Rotas M.A., Haberman S., Levgur M. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: Etiology, diagnosis, and management. Obstet. Gynecol. 2006;107:1373–1381. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000218690.24494.ce. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ushakov F.B., Elchalal U., Aceman P.J., Schenker J.G. Cervical pregnancy: Past and future. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 1997;52:45–59. doi: 10.1097/00006254-199701000-00023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rosen T. Placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy: Overlooked costs of the rising cesarean section rate. Clin. Perinatol. 2008;35:519–529. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2008.07.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health . National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Guidance. Caesarean Section. RCOG Press Copyright © 2011, National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health; London, UK: 2011.
    1. Kaelin Agten A., Cali G., Monteagudo A., Oviedo J., Ramos J., Timor-Tritsch I. The clinical outcome of cesarean scar pregnancies implanted “on the scar” versus “in the niche”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017;216:510.e1–510.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.019. - DOI - PubMed

Substances