Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 20;12(8):1713.
doi: 10.3390/plants12081713.

Plasticity in the Morphology of Growing Bamboo: A Bayesian Analysis of Exogenous Treatment Effects on Plant Height, Internode Length, and Internode Numbers

Affiliations

Plasticity in the Morphology of Growing Bamboo: A Bayesian Analysis of Exogenous Treatment Effects on Plant Height, Internode Length, and Internode Numbers

Chongyang Wu et al. Plants (Basel). .

Abstract

Sucrose (Suc) and gibberellin (GA) can promote the elongation of certain internodes in bamboo. However, there is a lack of field studies to support these findings and no evidence concerning how Suc and GA promote the plant height of bamboo by regulating the internode elongation and number. We investigated the plant height, the length of each internode, and the total number of internodes of Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) under exogenous Suc, GA, and control group (CTRL) treatments in the field and analyzed how Suc and GA affected the height of Moso bamboo by promoting the internode length and number. The lengths of the 10th-50th internodes were significantly increased under the exogenous Suc and GA treatments, and the number of internodes was significantly increased by the exogenous Suc treatment. The increased effect of Suc and GA exogenous treatment on the proportion of longer internodes showed a weakening trend near the plant height of 15-16 m compared with the CTRL, suggesting that these exogenous treatments may be more effective in regions where bamboo growth is suboptimal. This study demonstrated that both the exogenous Suc and GA treatments could promote internode elongation of Moso bamboo in the field. The exogenous GA treatment had a stronger effect on internode elongation, and the exogenous Suc treatment had a stronger effect on increasing the internode numbers. The increase in plant height by the exogenous Suc and GA treatments was promoted by the co-elongation of most internodes or the increase in the proportion of longer internodes.

Keywords: Bayesian analysis; bamboo; gibberellin; plant morphology; plasticity; sucrose.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparisons of the plant height (a), internode number (b), lengths of the 10th–20th internodes (c), lengths of the 20th–30th internodes (d), lengths of the 30th–40th internodes (e), and lengths of the 40th–50th internodes (f) under different exogenous treatments. Box plots and violin plots show the data distribution of each variable. Points represent the measured values of each variable. Red points indicate mean values. The numbers in brackets represent sampling numbers. An asterisk means a significant difference according to the Bayesian GLMM.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlations between the plant height; internode numbers; and lengths of the 10th–20th internodes, 20th–30th internodes, 30th–40th internodes, and 40th–50th internodes under different exogenous treatments. The different colors show each exogenous treatment. Numbers indicate Pearson correlation coefficients (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). Multidensity plots and scatterplots show the distributions of the variables.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The internode lengths at different internodes under Suc (a) and GA (b) treatments compared with the CTRL. The points indicate the mean value of the internode length. The colored shapes indicate a significant difference in the length of every ten internodes between the Suc or GA treatment and the CTRL. The mean values and standard error of 10 internodes with a significant difference are shown between the lines. The numbers in brackets represent the sample sizes.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The effect of the interaction between exogenous treatments and internode number on the internode length. The points represent the measured values of the internode length. The shaded intervals within the dashed lines show the 95% Bayesian credible intervals. The numbers in brackets represent the sample sizes (ah). The symbols + or − mean a significant positive interaction or negative interaction, respectively.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The percentages of internodes with different lengths under different exogenous treatments. The numbers in brackets represent the sample sizes. The symbols + or − mean a significant increase or significant decrease in the proportion of internodes compared with the CTRL, respectively.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The effects of the interactions between the exogenous treatments and plant height on the percentage of internodes with different lengths ((a,f) 0−10 cm, (b,g) 10−20 cm, (c,h) 20−30 cm, (d,i) 30−40 cm, and (e,j) 40−50 cm). The points represent the percentage of internodes of each length at different plant heights. The shaded intervals within the dashed line show the 95% Bayesian credible intervals. The numbers in brackets represent the sample sizes. The symbols + or − mean a significant positive or negative interaction, respectively.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Comparison of the estimated biomass and carbon storage under different exogenous treatments. The numbers at the bottom of the bar graph represent the average values. The error bars show the 95% Bayesian credible intervals. The asterisk means a significant difference according to the Bayesian GLMM. The numbers in brackets represent the sample sizes.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Study area.

References

    1. Sharma Y. In: Bamboos in the Asia Pacific Region. Lessard G., Chouinard A., editors. International Development Research Centre; Ottawa, ON, Canada: 1980.
    1. Scurlock J.M., Dayton D.C., Hames B. Bamboo: An overlooked biomass resource? Biomass Bioenergy. 2000;19:229–244. doi: 10.1016/S0961-9534(00)00038-6. - DOI
    1. Zhou B.Z., Fu M.Y., Xie J.Z., Yang X.S., Li Z.C. Ecological functions of bamboo forest: Research and Application. J. For. Res. 2005;16:143–147. doi: 10.1007/bf02857909. - DOI
    1. Song X.Z., Zhou G.M., Jiang H., Yu S.Q., Fu J.H., Li W.Z., Wang W.F., Ma Z.H., Peng C.H. Carbon sequestration by Chinese bamboo forests and their ecological benefits: Assessment of potential, problems, and future challenges. Environ. Rev. 2011;19:418–428. doi: 10.1139/a11-015. - DOI
    1. Choudhury D., Sahu J.K., Sharma G.D. Value addition to bamboo shoots: A review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2012;49:407–414. doi: 10.1007/s13197-011-0379-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources