Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 10;11(4):358.
doi: 10.3390/toxics11040358.

Enhanced Gastric/Lung Arsenic Bioaccessibility from Lignite Fly Ashes: Comparing Bioaccessibility Rates with Multiple Environmental Matrices

Affiliations

Enhanced Gastric/Lung Arsenic Bioaccessibility from Lignite Fly Ashes: Comparing Bioaccessibility Rates with Multiple Environmental Matrices

Anna Bourliva et al. Toxics. .

Abstract

Inorganic arsenic (As), a carcinogenic element to humans, is among the most dangerous and flammable substances that coal-burning plants could release. When coal is burned, large portions of arsenic are captured on fly-ash (FA) particles, but it could also contribute significantly to stack emissions of fine fly-ash particles. The aim of this study was to evaluate the oral and respiratory bioaccessibility of arsenic in lignite fly-ash (LFA) samples, and their contribution to total As exposure. Arsenic bioaccessibility fractions via ingestion and inhalation showed significant differences, suggesting the presence of highly soluble As-bearing phases in the studied LFA samples. The bioaccessible As fractions (BAF%) in the simulated gastric fluids (UBM protocol, ISO 17924:2018) showed a range of 45-73%, while the pulmonary bioaccessibility rates in the simulated lung fluid (artificial lung fluid (ALF)) exhibited significantly enhanced levels ranging from 86% to 95%. The obtained arsenic bioaccessibility rates were compared with previous data for multiple environmental matrices such as soil and dust-related materials, revealing that LFA exhibited significantly higher bioaccessibility (%) for the inhalation pathway.

Keywords: Greece; arsenic; bioaccessibility; gastric; lignite fly ash; mineralogy; respiratory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 3
Figure 3
Arsenic concentrations (mg kg−1) in the <250 and <10 μm size fractions, and a comparison of the obtained As contents with published data 1 [10], 2 [17], 3 [49], 4 [48].
Figure 1
Figure 1
Representative XRD patterns of Ca-rich (Sample AD, top) and Si-rich (Sample MG1, bottom) fly-ash samples of the two different studied size fractions. An: anhydrite, Bsn: bassanite, C: calcite, Etr: ettringite, Ghl: gehlenite, Gps: gypsum, Ht: hematite, L: lime, Prt: portlandite, Pl: plagioclase, Q: quartz. The concentration units of pXRF results are given in the inlets.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Representative SEM images of the studied fly-ash samples.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Arsenic bioaccessibility (in mg kg−1) of lignite fly-ash samples in (left) gastric (G)/gastrointestinal (GI) and (right) lung fluids.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Arsenic bioaccessibility (%) of lignite fly-ash samples in gastric and lung fluids.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Heat maps of Pearson’s correlation coefficients matrix for (left) gastric and (right) lung As bioaccessibility and selected geochemical parameters. Correlations in red are positive and in green are negative. p < 0.01 significance is marked in bold, and p < 0.05 in underlined.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Comparison of As bioaccessible fractions (%) between LFA and other environmental materials. Data for other coal FAs are from Jin et al. [38], for soil, road dust, and house dust are from Kelepertzis et al. [54], and those for fine surface dust (FSD) are from Morais et al. [55]. The box is determined by the 25th and 75th percentiles. The whiskers (−) are determined by the 5th and 95th percentiles. Additionally, the minimum (*), median (line), mean (□) and maximum (*) values are presented. Green boxes: this study; Yellow boxes: other FAs; Red boxes: other materials.

Similar articles

References

    1. IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) Arsenic, Metals, Fibres, and Dusts. Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. A Review of Human Carcinogens. Volume 100 (C) IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer); Lyon, France: 2012.
    1. Henke K. Arsenic: Environmental Chemistry, Health Threats and Waste Treatment. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; Chichester, UK: 2009. pp. 69–235.
    1. Mohammed Abdul K.S., Jayasinghe S.S., Chandana E.P.S., Jayasumana C., De Silva P.M. Arsenic and human health effects: A review. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2015;40:828–846. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2015.09.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dauphinė D.C., Smith A.H., Yuan Y., Balmes J.R., Bates M.N., Steinmaus C. Case–control study of arsenic in drinking water and lung cancer in California and Nevada. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2013;10:3310–3324. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10083310. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sohel N., Vahter M., Ali M., Rahman M., Streatfield P.K., Kanaroglou P.S., Persson L.A. Spatial patterns of fetal loss and infant death in an arsenic-affected area in Bangladesh. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2010;9:53. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-9-53. - DOI - PMC - PubMed