Risk Evaluation of Pollutants Emission from Coal and Coal Waste Combustion Plants and Environmental Impact of Fly Ash Landfilling
- PMID: 37112623
- PMCID: PMC10144006
- DOI: 10.3390/toxics11040396
Risk Evaluation of Pollutants Emission from Coal and Coal Waste Combustion Plants and Environmental Impact of Fly Ash Landfilling
Abstract
Emission factors (EFs) of gaseous pollutants, particulate matter, certain harmful trace elements, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from three thermal power plants (TPPs) and semi-industrial fluidized bed boiler (FBB) were compared. EFs of particulate matter, trace elements (except Cd and Pb), benzo[a]pyrene, and benzo[b]fluoranthene exceed the upper limits specified in the EMEP inventory guidebook for all combustion facilities. The comparison of trace elements and PAHs content in fly ashes (FAs) from lignite and coal waste combustion in TPPs and FBB, respectively, as well as the potential environmental impact of FAs disposal, was performed by employing a set of ecological indicators such as crustal enrichment factor, risk assessment code, risk indices for trace elements, and benzo[a]pyrene equivalent concentration for PAHs. Sequential analysis shows that the trace elements portion is the lowest for water-soluble and exchangeable fractions. The highest enrichment levels in FAs are noticed for As and Hg. Based on toxic trace elements content, FAs from TPPs represent a very high ecological risk, whereas fly ash from FBB poses a moderate ecological risk but has the highest benzo[a]pyrene equivalent concentration, indicating its increased carcinogenic potential. Lead isotope ratios for Serbian coals and FAs can contribute to a lead pollution global database.
Keywords: PAHs; coal and coal waste combustion; emission; environmental risk estimation; fly ash disposal; gaseous pollutants; lead isotopic fingerprint; particulate matter; trace elements.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures







Similar articles
-
Distribution of PAHs in coal ashes from the thermal power plant and fluidized bed combustion system; estimation of environmental risk of ash disposal.Environ Pollut. 2020 Nov;266(Pt 3):115282. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115282. Epub 2020 Aug 9. Environ Pollut. 2020. PMID: 32799176
-
[Emission Characteristics and Toxicity Effects of Halogenated Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from Coal-Fired and Waste Incineration Power Plants].Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2021 Apr 8;42(4):1660-1667. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202007298. Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2021. PMID: 33742801 Chinese.
-
Co-combustion of tannery sludge in a commercial circulating fluidized bed boiler.Waste Manag. 2015 Dec;46:227-33. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Aug 13. Waste Manag. 2015. PMID: 26278370
-
A review of physical, chemical, and biological properties of fly ash and effects on agricultural ecosystems.Sci Total Environ. 1988 Aug 1;74:1-37. doi: 10.1016/0048-9697(88)90127-1. Sci Total Environ. 1988. PMID: 3065936 Review.
-
A review on fly ash from coal-fired power plants: chemical composition, regulations, and health evidence.Rev Environ Health. 2020 Apr 22;35(4):401-418. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2019-0039. Print 2020 Nov 18. Rev Environ Health. 2020. PMID: 32324165 Review.
Cited by
-
Ecological and Health Risks Attributed to Rare Earth Elements in Coal Fly Ash.Toxics. 2024 Jan 15;12(1):71. doi: 10.3390/toxics12010071. Toxics. 2024. PMID: 38251026 Free PMC article.
-
Research on the Mechanical Properties of EPS Lightweight Soil Mixed with Fly Ash.Polymers (Basel). 2024 Dec 18;16(24):3517. doi: 10.3390/polym16243517. Polymers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39771369 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Moroń W., Rybak W. NOx and SO2 emissions of coals, biomass and their blends under different oxy-fuel atmospheres. Atmos. Environ. 2015;116:65–71. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.06.013. - DOI
-
- Fdez-Ortiz de Vallejuelo S., Gredilla A., da Boit K., Teixeira E.C., Sampaio C.H., Madariaga J.M., Silva L.F.O. Nanominerals and potentially hazardous elements from coal cleaning rejects of abandoned mines: Environmental impact and risk assessment. Chemosphere. 2017;169:725–733. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.125. - DOI - PubMed
-
- EPI. [(accessed on 12 March 2023)]. Available online: http://www.eps.rs/eng/Documents/Kompanijski%20Profil%202018%20-%20ENG.pdf.
-
- EPI. [(accessed on 10 March 2023)]. Available online: https://www.eps.rs/eng/Documents/technicalreports/TEH_Godisnjak2018_web_....
-
- IEA. [(accessed on 10 March 2023)]. Available online: https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/c40f0317-f8e6-4f00-b183-27a24c7....
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous