Adoption of Digital Vaccination Services: It Is the Click Flow, Not the Value-An Empirical Analysis of the Vaccination Management of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany
- PMID: 37112662
- PMCID: PMC10145467
- DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11040750
Adoption of Digital Vaccination Services: It Is the Click Flow, Not the Value-An Empirical Analysis of the Vaccination Management of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany
Abstract
This research paper examines the adoption of digital services for the vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. Based on a survey in Germany's federal state with the highest vaccination rate, which used digital vaccination services, its platform configuration and adoption barriers are analyzed to understand existing and future levers for optimizing vaccination success. Though technological adoption and resistance models have been originally developed for consumer-goods markets, this study gives empirical evidence especially for the applicability of an adjusted model explaining platform adoption for vaccination services and for digital health services in general. In this model, the configuration areas of personalization, communication, and data management have a remarkable effect to lower adoption barriers, but only functional and psychological factors affect the adoption intention. Above all, the usability barrier stands out with the strongest effect, while the often-cited value barrier is not significant at all. Personalization is found to be the most important factor for managing the usability barrier and thus for addressing the needs, preferences, situation, and, ultimately, the adoption of the citizens as users. Implications are given for policy makers and managers in such a pandemic crisis to focus on the click flow and server-to-human interaction rather than emphasizing value messages or touching traditional factors.
Keywords: COVID-19; acceptance model; innovation barriers; pandemic; platform technology; technology adoption model; vaccination; vaccination services.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Modeling Adoption, Security, and Privacy of COVID-19 Apps: Findings and Recommendations From an Empirical Study Using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology.JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Sep 14;9(3):e35434. doi: 10.2196/35434. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022. PMID: 35862671 Free PMC article.
-
Adoption of delivery services in light of the COVID pandemic: Who and how long?Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2021 Dec;154:270-286. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2021.10.012. Epub 2021 Nov 2. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2021. PMID: 34744329 Free PMC article.
-
Integrating technology in mental healthcare practice: A repeated cross-sectional survey study on professionals' adoption of Digital Mental Health before and during COVID-19.Front Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 16;13:1040023. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1040023. eCollection 2022. Front Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 36874171 Free PMC article.
-
Digital Health Value Realization Through Active Change Efforts.Front Public Health. 2021 Oct 12;9:741424. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.741424. eCollection 2021. Front Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34712641 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Consumer Health Informatics Adoption among Underserved Populations: Thinking beyond the Digital Divide.Yearb Med Inform. 2018 Aug;27(1):146-155. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1641217. Epub 2018 Aug 29. Yearb Med Inform. 2018. PMID: 30157518 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Integrating Digital Health Solutions with Immunization Strategies: Improving Immunization Coverage and Monitoring in the Post-COVID-19 Era.Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Jul 28;12(8):847. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12080847. Vaccines (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39203973 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Kitagawa T., Wang G. Who should get vaccinated? Individualized allocation of vaccines over SIR network. J. Econom. 2021;232:109–131. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.09.009. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources