Efficacy of anti-IL-23 and anti-IL-17 after adalimumab failure in psoriatic patients
- PMID: 37113043
- DOI: 10.1111/jdv.19135
Efficacy of anti-IL-23 and anti-IL-17 after adalimumab failure in psoriatic patients
Abstract
Background: Many national guidelines at the European level recommend first-line therapy based on the anti-TNF-alpha adalimumab for treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, mainly for economic reasons. Consequently, patients being treated with newer IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors underwent previous unsuccessful first-line adalimumab-based therapy.
Objectives: Evaluate the efficacy and safety of IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors after treatment with adalimumab compared to adalimumab-naive psoriatic patients.
Methods: We retrospectively analysed 1053 psoriatic patients treated with anti-IL17 and anti-IL23 agents, which included 68 and 24 adalimumab-experienced and 399 and 260 bio-naive patients. Efficacy was assessed with mean PASI, PASI90, PASI100, and <3.
Results: Concerning the achieving of PASI100, PASI90 and PASI < 3 in patients treated with anti-IL17 agents, no significant differences were observed between adalimumab-experienced and bio-naive patients. In patients treated with an anti-IL-23 agent, a faster response was observed in bio-naive patients, with PASI < 3 significantly higher than ADA-experienced patients at 16 weeks (77% vs. 58% p = 0.048). In a sub-analysis that evaluated the performance of anti-IL17 and anti-IL23 agents in adalimumab-experienced patients with a history of secondary failure, no significant differences were found. In multivariate analysis of PASI100, only anti-IL-17 therapy appeared to have a negative impact at 52 weeks (OR: 0.54 p = 0.04) independently of previous treatment. For PASI90, type of treatment and bio-naïve status did not seem to have an impact at any time point.
Conclusions: Anti-IL 23 and anti-IL 17 agents are not significantly different in terms of efficacy in bio-naive patients or as second-line therapy after failure with a biosimilar or originator adalimumab.
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.
Comment in
-
Regarding Mastorino et al.'s 'Efficacy of anti-IL-23 and anti-IL-17 after adalimumab failure in psoriatic patients'.J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023 Dec;37(12):e1388-e1389. doi: 10.1111/jdv.19334. Epub 2023 Jul 26. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023. PMID: 37458245 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Tsai YC, Tsai TF. Switching biologics in psoriasis - practical guidance and evidence to support. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2020;13(5):493-503. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2020.1767590
-
- Cariti C, Dapavo P, Mastorino L, Ortoncelli M, Siliquini N, Merli M, et al. Comparison of Secukinumab and Ixekizumab in psoriasis: a real-life cohort study on the efficacy and drug survival of 445 patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022;36(3):e233-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.17766
-
- Mastorino L, Castelli F, Stroppiana E, Verrone A, Ortoncelli M, Susca S, et al. Risankizumab shows faster response in bio naïve than in bio-experienced psoriatic patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022;36(10):e838-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.18314
-
- Curmin R, Guillo S, de Rycke Y, Bachelez H, Beylot-Barry M, Beneton N, et al. Switches between biologics in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: results from the French cohort PSOBIOTEQ. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022;36(11):2101-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.18409
-
- Ariani A, Santilli D, Mozzani F, Lumetti F, Lucchini G, di Donato E, et al. Cycling or swap biologics and small molecules in psoriatic arthritis: observations from a real-life single center cohort. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(16):e25300. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025300
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
