Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 11:10:1113013.
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1113013. eCollection 2023.

Factors affecting fruit and vegetable consumption and purchase behavior of adults in sub-Saharan Africa: A rapid review

Affiliations

Factors affecting fruit and vegetable consumption and purchase behavior of adults in sub-Saharan Africa: A rapid review

Barbara Stadlmayr et al. Front Nutr. .

Abstract

In order to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals, considerable dietary shifts, including an increase in the consumption of fruit and vegetables (FV) will be required. However, worldwide consumption of FV is far below international recommendations, including in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), particularly in Africa. Understanding what, where, when, and how people choose to eat requires an understanding of how individuals are influenced by factors in their social, physical, and macro-level environments. In order to develop effective interventions to increase fruit and vegetable consumption, the factors influencing consumer behavior need to be better understood. We conducted a rapid review to assess and synthesize data on individual, social, physical, and macro-level factors that enable or constrain fruit and vegetable consumption and purchase among adults living in sub-Saharan Africa. Our conceptual framework is based on a socio-ecological model which has been adapted to settings in LMICs and Africa. We systematically searched four electronic databases including Scopus, Medline (PubMed), PsycInfo, and African Index Medicus, and screened Google Scholar for gray literature. We included a total of 52 studies and narratively summarized the existing evidence for each identified factor across the different levels. We found that most studies assessed demographic factors at the individual level including household or family income, socio-economic status and education. Furthermore we identified a variety of important factors that influence FV consumption, in the social, physical, and macro environment. These include women's empowerment and gender inequalities, the influence of neighborhood and retail food environment such as distance to market and price of FV as well as the importance of natural landscapes including forest areas for FV consumption. This review identified the need to develop and improve indicators both for exposure and outcome variables but also to diversify research approaches.

Keywords: consumer behavior; diets; food environment; fruit; sub-Saharan Africa; sustainable food systems; vegetables.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Geographic distribution of included studies across SSA (series: number of studies). Created using https://www.mapbox.com/.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Conceptual framework based on a socio-ecological framework (12) and its adaptation for LMICs (18, 19) and Africa (11) illustrating identified factors in the review that affect fruit and vegetable consumption and purchase. Exposure/factors represented showed an association with the outcome variable or significant differences in the outcome variable. (ii) Outcome: Most outcome variables refers to FV consumption in terms of quantity (“What”) and frequency (“How”).

References

    1. Imamura F, Micha R, Khatibzadeh S, Fahimi S, Shi P, Powles J, et al. . Dietary quality among men and women in 187 countries in 1990 and 2010: a systematic assessment. Lancet Glob Health. (2015) 3:e132–42. 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70381-X - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S, et al. . Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet. (2019) 393:447–92. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Development Initiatives. 2021 Global Nutrition Report: The State of Global Nutrition. Bristol: Development Initiatives; (2021)
    1. Afshin A, Sur PJ, Fay KA, Cornaby L, Ferrara G, Salama JS, et al. . Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. (2019) 393:1958–72. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30041-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gouda HN, Charlson F, Sorsdahl K, Ahmadzada S, Ferrari AJ, Erskine H, et al. . Burden of non-communicable diseases in sub-Saharan Africa, 1990–2017: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Glob Health. (2019) 7:e1375–87. 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30374-2 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources