Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 11:10:1137027.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1137027. eCollection 2023.

Sepsis survivors and caregivers perspectives on post-acute rehabilitation and aftercare in the first year after sepsis in Germany

Sebastian Born  1   2 , Claudia Matthäus-Krämer  1   2 , Anna Bichmann  3 , Hannah-Sophia Boltz  1   2 , Marlene Esch  3 , Luisa Heydt  1   2 , Stefan Sell  1   2 , Kathleen Streich  3 , André Scherag  2   4 , Konrad Reinhart  3 , Christiane S Hartog  2   5 , Carolin Fleischmann-Struzek  1   2
Affiliations

Sepsis survivors and caregivers perspectives on post-acute rehabilitation and aftercare in the first year after sepsis in Germany

Sebastian Born et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Background: Sepsis survivors often suffer from new morbidities. Current rehabilitation therapies are not tailored to their specific needs. The perspective of sepsis survivors and their caregivers on rehabilitation and aftercare is insufficiently understood. We aimed to assess how sepsis survivors in Germany rated the suitability, extent and satisfaction with rehabilitation therapies that they underwent in the year following the acute sepsis episode.

Methods: Prospective mixed-methods, multicenter study among a cohort of adult ICU-treated sepsis survivors and their caregivers. Interviews were conducted 6 and 12 months after ICU discharge by telephone and comprised closed as well as open-ended questions. Primary outcomes were the utilization and patient satisfaction with inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation and post-sepsis aftercare in general. Open-ended questions were analyzed according to the principles of content analysis.

Results: Foun hundred interviews were performed with 287 patients and/or relatives. At 6 months after sepsis, 85.0% of survivors had applied for and 70.0% had undergone rehabilitation. Among these, 97% received physical therapy, but only a minority reported therapies for specific ailments including pain, weaning from mechanical ventilation, cognitive deficits of fatigue. Survivors were moderately satisfied with the suitability, extent, and overall results of received therapies and perceived deficits in the timeliness, accessibility, and specificity of therapies as well as deficits in the structural support frameworks and patient education.

Conclusion: From the perspective of survivors who undergo rehabilitation, therapies should already begin in hospital, be more appropriate for their specific ailments and include better patient and caregiver education. The general aftercare and structural support framework should be improved.

Keywords: aftercare; post-sepsis-syndrome; rehabilitation; sepsis; survivors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of patient inclusion.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Specialties of inpatient rehabilitation utilized by sepsis survivors (combined for 6 and 12 months interview). (B) Therapies received in rehabilitation by sepsis survivors (combined for 6 and 12 months interview). (C) Impairments of sepsis survivors addressed during the rehabilitation (combined for 6 and 12 months interview).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Rating of satisfaction with fit, extent and outcome of (A) rehabilitation by impairment and (B) rehabilitation and aftercare in general (combined for 6 and 12 months interview).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Categorized unmet needs in post–acute rehabilitation and aftercare.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Iwashyna TJ, Ely EW, Smith DM, Langa KM. Long-term cognitive impairment and functional disability among survivors of severe sepsis. JAMA. (2010) 304:1787–94. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1553, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prescott HC, Angus DC. Enhancing recovery from sepsis: a review. JAMA. (2018) 319:62–75. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17687, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fleischmann-Struzek C, Rose N, Freytag A, Spoden M, Prescott HC, Schettler A, et al. . Epidemiology and costs of Postsepsis morbidity, nursing care dependency, and mortality in Germany, 2013 to 2017. JAMA Netw Open. (2021) 4:e2134290. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.34290, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Poulsen JB, Moller K, Kehlet H, Perner A. Long-term physical outcome in patients with septic shock. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. (2009) 53:724–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.01921.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Prescott HC, Iwashyna TJ, Blackwood B, Calandra T, Chlan LL, Choong K, et al. . Understanding and enhancing sepsis survivorship. Priorities for research and practice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2019) 200:972–81. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201812-2383CP, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources