Association between the functional FCGR3A F158V and FCGR2A R131H polymorphisms and responsiveness to biologics in rheumatoid arthritis patients: A meta-analysis
- PMID: 37114884
- DOI: 10.1111/1756-185X.14719
Association between the functional FCGR3A F158V and FCGR2A R131H polymorphisms and responsiveness to biologics in rheumatoid arthritis patients: A meta-analysis
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the association between functional Fc gamma receptor 3A (FCGR3A) V158F and FCGR2A R131H polymorphisms and biologic therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.
Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochran databases for available articles. This study is a meta-analysis of the association between the FCGR3A V158F and FCGR2A R131H polymorphisms and their responsiveness to biologics in RA patients.
Results: Seventeen studies involving RA patients with FCGR3A V158F (n = 1884) and FCGR2A R131H (n = 1118) polymorphisms were considered. This meta-analysis showed that the FCGR3A V allele was associated with responsiveness to rituximab (odds ratio [OR] = 1.431, 95% CI = 1.081-1.894, P = 0.012), but not with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockers, tocilizumab, or abatacept. A significant association was also found between the FCGR3A V158F polymorphism and responsiveness to biologics using the dominant-recessive model. Additionally, the FCGR3A V158F polymorphism was associated with responsiveness to TNF blockers in the homozygous contrast model. Meta-analysis revealed an association between the FCGR2A RR + RH genotype and responsiveness to biologics (OR = 1.385, 95% CI = 1.007-1.904, P = 0.045).
Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates that FCGR3A V allele carriers show better responsiveness to rituximab, and FCGR2A R allele carriers may show a better response to biologics in RA treatment. Genotyping of these polymorphisms could be a useful tool to find associations with the responsiveness of personalized medicine to biologics.
Keywords: FCGR2A; FCGR3A; biologics; polymorphisms; responsiveness; rheumatoid arthritis.
© 2023 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Kim H, Sung YK. Epidemiology of rheumatoid arthritis in Korea. J Rheum Dis. 2021;28(2):60-67. doi:10.4078/jrd.2021.28.2.60
-
- Lee YK, Bae SC. Mortality in Korean patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheum Dis. 2021;28(3):113-118. doi:10.4078/jrd.2021.28.3.113
-
- Lipsky PE, van der Heijde DM, St Clair EW, et al. Infliximab and methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Anti-tumor necrosis factor trial in rheumatoid arthritis with concomitant therapy study group. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(22):1594-1602. doi:10.1056/nejm200011303432202
-
- Smolen JS, van der Heijde D, Machold KP, Aletaha D, Landewé R. Proposal for a new nomenclature of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(1):3-5. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204317
-
- Kim J, Koh JH, Choi SJ, et al. KOBIO, the first web-based Korean biologics registry operated with a unified platform among distinct disease entities. J Rheum Dis. 2021;28(4):176-182. doi:10.4078/jrd.2021.28.4.176
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
