Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 25;102(17):e33596.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033596.

Does one of the two most commonly used scoring systems have a decisive advantage over the other in diagnosing acute appendicitis in pregnant women?

Affiliations

Does one of the two most commonly used scoring systems have a decisive advantage over the other in diagnosing acute appendicitis in pregnant women?

Osman Bardakçi et al. Medicine (Baltimore). .

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the accuracy and reliability of Alvarado Score (AS) and Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score (AIRS) in pregnant women undergoing surgery for acute appendicitis (AA). The files of 53 pregnant women with a diagnosis of AA who underwent surgery in our clinic between February 2014 and December 2018 were examined retrospectively. The patients were divided into 3 groups as follows: first trimester between 0 and 14 weeks, second trimester between 15 and 28 weeks, and third trimester between 29 and 42 weeks. The AS and AIRS values were calculated according to preoperative physical examination and laboratory results. The mean age of the patients was 28.58 (18-44) years. According to the pathology results, appendicitis was detected in 16 of 23 patients in the first trimester, in 22 of 25 patients in the second trimester, and in 2 of 5 patients in the third trimester. The AIRS was ≥ 9 in 9 patients and the AS was ≥ 7 in 19 of the 23 patients in the 1st trimester, while the AIRS was ≥ 9 in 11 patients and the AS was ≥ 7 in 19 of the 25 patients in the 2nd trimester. However, in the 3rd trimester, the AIRS was ≥ 9 in 2 patients and AS was ≥ 7 in 4 of the 5 patients. In conclusion, when the data obtained from the present study were evaluated, it was determined that both AS and AIRS are effective methods for diagnosing AA in pregnant women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

    1. Zingone F, Sultan AA, Humes DJ, et al. Risk of acute appendicitis in and around pregnancy: a population-based cohort study from England. Ann Surg. 2015;261:332–7. - PubMed
    1. O’Donnell ME, Badger SA, Beattie GC, et al. Malignant neoplasms of the appendix. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22:1239–48. - PubMed
    1. Al-Qudah MS, Amr M, Sroujieh A, et al. Appendectomy in pregnancy: the experience of a university hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;19:362–4. - PubMed
    1. McGory ML, Zingmond DS, Tillou A, et al. Negative appendectomy in pregnant women is associated with a substantial risk of fetal loss. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205:534–40. - PubMed
    1. Bouyou J, Gaujoux S, Marcellin L, et al. Abdominal emergencies during pregnancy. J Visc Surg. 2015;152:S105–15. - PubMed