Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul;6(7):e1825.
doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1825. Epub 2023 Apr 28.

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment for head and neck mucosal melanoma recurrence in patients treated with carbon-ion radiotherapy

Affiliations

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment for head and neck mucosal melanoma recurrence in patients treated with carbon-ion radiotherapy

Atsushi Musha et al. Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2023 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Carbon-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) is effective for head and neck mucosal melanoma (HN-MM), including radioresistant mucosal melanoma. Melanoma also responds effectively to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Data on the efficacy and safety of ICIs for HN-MM are insufficient.

Aims: To analyze the efficacy and safety of ICI salvage therapy in patients with HN-MM recurrence after C-ion RT.

Methods and results: This retrospective study analyzed the medical records of 52 patients with HN-MM treated with C-ion RT between 2012 and 2020. A dose of 57.6 or 64.0 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) was provided in 16 fractions. The primary endpoint was 3-year overall survival (OS) rate. The median follow-up time was 26.8 months for all patients. A total of 29 patients had local recurrence or distant metastasis, and 16 patients who received ICI therapy. The 3-year OS rate in the ICI group (n = 16) and best supportive care group (n = 13) were 53.8% and 0.0%, respectively (p = 0.837); the difference was not statistically significant. There were no deaths after 1 year among patients who underwent ICI therapy. No adverse events associated with C-ion RT were related to or exacerbated by ICI.

Conclusion: ICI salvage therapy is effective and safe for patients with HN-MM recurrence after C-ion RT.

Keywords: chemotherapy; melanoma; radiotherapy; survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have stated explicitly that there are no conflicts of interest in connection with this article.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow chart of patients with mucosal malignant melanoma treated with carbon‐ion radiotherapy.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
OS, LC, and PFS curves of patients with mucosal malignant melanoma treated with carbon‐ion radiotherapy. (A) The 3‐year OS rate for all patients (n = 52) was 64.3%. (B) The 3‐year LC rate for all patients (n = 52) was 86.3%. (C) The 3‐year PFS rate for all patients (n = 52) was 31.1%. LC, local control; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression‐free survival.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
OS curve of patients with mucosal malignant melanoma treated with C‐ion RT with or without ICIs. (A) ICI agents were approved for treating melanoma in 2014 in Japan. The patients (n = 52) were divided into two groups based on whether they had been diagnosed before 2014 (n = 8) or after 2014 (n = 44). The 3‐year OS rates of those diagnosed before 2014 (dotted line) and those diagnosed after 2014 (straight line) were 0.0% and 76.4%, respectively (p = .000) (B) The 3‐year OS rates in the ICI group (n = 16) (straight line) and BSC group (n = 13) (dotted line) were 53.8% and 0.0%, respectively (p = 0.482). This is the OS after the diagnosis of recurrence (any site) and treatment with C‐ion RT. BSC, best supportive care; C‐ion RT, carbon‐ion radiotherapy; ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitor; OS, overall survival.

References

    1. Chang AE, Karnell LH, Menck HR. The National Cancer Data Base report on cutaneous and noncutaneous melanoma: a summary of 84,836 cases from the past decade. The American College of Surgeons Commission on cancer and the American Cancer Society. Cancer. 1998;83(8):1664‐1678. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19981015)83:8<1664::aid-cncr23>3.0.co;2-g - DOI - PubMed
    1. Temam S, Mamelle G, Marandas P, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy for primary mucosal melanoma of the head and neck. Cancer. 2005;103(2):313‐319. doi:10.1002/cncr.20775 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Meng XJ, Ao HF, Huang WT, et al. Impact of different surgical and postoperative adjuvant treatment modalities on survival of sinonasal malignant melanoma. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:608. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-14-608 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adilbay D, Valero C, Fitzgerald C, et al. Outcomes in surgical management of sinonasal malignancy‐a single comprehensive cancer center experience. Head Neck. 2022;44(4):933‐942. doi:10.1002/hed.26989 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gavriel H, McArthur G, Sizeland A, Henderson M. Review: mucosal melanoma of the head and neck. Melanoma Res. 2011;21(4):257‐266. doi:10.1097/CMR.0b013e3283470ffd - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources