Patient perspectives on risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy for ovarian cancer risk-reduction: A systematic review of the literature
- PMID: 37116391
- PMCID: PMC10650971
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.006
Patient perspectives on risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy for ovarian cancer risk-reduction: A systematic review of the literature
Abstract
Objective: Increasing evidence suggests the fallopian tube as the site of origin of BRCA1/2-associated high-grade ovarian cancers. Several ongoing trials are evaluating salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy (RRSDO) for ovarian cancer risk reduction and patients are beginning to ask their clinicians about this surgical option. This study sought to systematically review the available literature examining patient preferences regarding RRSDO and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) to provide clinicians with an understanding of patient values, concerns, and priorities surrounding ovarian cancer risk-reducing surgery.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PROSPERO No.: CRD42023400690). We searched key electronic databases to identify studies evaluating acceptance and surgical decision-making regarding RRSO and RRSDO among patients with an increased risk of ovarian cancer.
Results: The search yielded 239 results, among which six publications met the systematic review inclusion criteria. Acceptance of RRSDO was evaluated in all studies and ranged from 34% to 71%. Factors positively impacting patients' acceptance of RRSDO included: avoidance of surgical menopause, preservation of fertility, concerns about sexual dysfunction, family history of breast cancer, and avoidance of hormone replacement therapy. Factors limiting this acceptance reported by patients included concerns regarding oncologic safety, surgical timing, and surgical complications.
Conclusion: To date, few studies have explored patient perspectives surrounding RRSDO. Collectively, the limited data available indicate a high level of acceptance among BRCA1/2 carriers, and provides insight regarding both facilitating and limiting factors associated with patient preferences to better equip clinicians in the counseling and support of their patients.
Keywords: BRCA1; BRCA2; Hereditary cancer syndromes; Ovarian cancer; Patient preferences; Risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy (RRSDO); Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest Disclosures:
Kevin Holcomb: Johnson and Johnson: Consultant. Fujirebio Diagnostics: Research support.
Shoshana Rosenberg: Pfizer/Conquer Cancer: Research support.
Figures
References
-
- Cancer Stat Facts: Ovarian Cancer. 2022. [cited 2023 March 14]; Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/ovary.html.
-
- Lancaster JM, et al., Society of Gynecologic Oncology statement on risk assessment for inherited gynecologic cancer predispositions. Gynecol Oncol, 2015. 136(1): p. 3–7. - PubMed
-
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines Version 1.2023: Breast, Ovarian, and/or Pancreatic Cancer Genetic Assessment.
-
- Guillem JG, et al., ASCO/SSO review of current role of risk-reducing surgery in common hereditary cancer syndromes. J Clin Oncol, 2006. 24(28): p. 4642–60. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
