Intraoperative computed tomography during fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair: a feasibility study
- PMID: 37116869
- PMCID: PMC10225993
- DOI: 10.1177/02841851231165673
Intraoperative computed tomography during fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair: a feasibility study
Abstract
Background: Endovascular aortic repair with fenestrated or branched endografts is technically challenging, and proper intraoperative assessment of all stent graft components with only angiography and fluoroscopy can be difficult. Intraoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging can be a valuable aid for the operators in the evaluation of stent grafting results prior to completion of surgery.
Purpose: To examine the feasibility of performing intraoperative CT imaging during fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (f-bEVAR) under sterile conditions and with patients under general anesthesia.
Material and methods: Intraoperative CT imaging was performed in 10 patients undergoing elective aortic repair with fenestrated or branched endografts. Adverse events, time consumption for CT set-up and image acquisition, and additional radiation dose to the patient were recorded. CT image quality was graded. Immediate corrective maneuvers performed based on the CT findings was registered.
Results: There were no adverse events related to intraoperative CT imaging. The median additional operating time by including intraoperative CT was 16 min (interquartile range [IQR] = 12-19), comprising 7% of the median total operating time. The median estimated additional radiation dose to the patient was 4.8 mSv (IQR = 3.8-4.9). All intraoperative CT examinations were considered to be of sufficient quality for stent graft evaluation. No immediate corrective procedures were performed on the basis of CT findings in this study cohort.
Conclusion: CT imaging intraoperatively during f-bEVAR is feasible with an acceptable increase in operating time and radiation dose.
Keywords: Computed tomography; aneurysms; aorta; technology assessments; vascular.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
References
-
- Doonan RJ, Girsowicz E, Dubois L, et al.A systematic review and meta-analysis of endovascular juxtarenal aortic aneurysm repair demonstrates lower perioperative mortality compared with open repair. J Vasc Surg 2019;70:2054–2064. - PubMed
-
- Wanhainen A, Verzini F, Van Herzeele I, et al.Editor’s choice - European society for vascular surgery (ESVS) 2019 clinical practice guidelines on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2019;57:8–93. - PubMed
-
- Bianchini Massoni C, Gargiulo M, Giovanetti F, et al.Adjunctive stenting of endograft limbs during endovascular treatment of infrarenal aortic and iliac aneurysms according to 3-projection completion angiography. J Endovasc Ther 2011;18:585–590. - PubMed
-
- Biasi L, Ali T, Ratnam LA, et al.Intra-operative DynaCT improves technical success of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2009;49:288–295. - PubMed
-
- Mezzetto L, Mastrorilli D, Abatucci G, et al.Impact of cone beam computed tomography in advanced endovascular aortic aneurysm repair using last generation 3D C-arm. Ann Vasc Surg 2022;78:132–140. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
