Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct;41(4):809-847.
doi: 10.5534/wjmh.230008. Epub 2023 Apr 20.

Controversy and Consensus on the Management of Elevated Sperm DNA Fragmentation in Male Infertility: A Global Survey, Current Guidelines, and Expert Recommendations

Ala'a Farkouh  1 Ashok Agarwal  1   2 Taha Abo-Almagd Abdel-Meguid Hamoda  3   4 Parviz Kavoussi  5 Ramadan Saleh  6   7 Armand Zini  8 Mohamed Arafa  9   10   11 Ahmed M Harraz  12   13   14 Murat Gul  15 Vilvapathy Senguttuvan Karthikeyan  16 Damayanthi Durairajanayagam  17 Amarnath Rambhatla  18 Florence Boitrelle  19   20 Eric Chung  21 Ponco Birowo  22 Tuncay Toprak  23 Ramy Abou Ghayda  24 Rossella Cannarella  25   26 Nguyen Ho Vinh Phuoc  27   28 Fotios Dimitriadis  29 Giorgio I Russo  30 Ioannis Sokolakis  29 Taymour Mostafa  10 Konstantinos Makarounis  31 Imad Ziouziou  32 Shinnosuke Kuroda  26 Marion Bendayan  19 Raneen Sawaid Kaiyal  26 Andrian Japari  33 Mara Simopoulou  34 Lucia Rocco  35 Nicolas Garrido  36 Nazim Gherabi  37 Kadir Bocu  38 Oguzhan Kahraman  39 Tan V Le  27   28 Christine Wyns  40 Kelton Tremellen  41 Selcuk Sarikaya  42 Sheena Lewis  43 Donald P Evenson  44 Edmund Ko  45 Aldo E Calogero  25 Fahmi Bahar  46 Marlon Martinez  47 Andrea Crafa  25 Quang Nguyen  48   49 Rafael F Ambar  50   51 Giovanni Colpi  52 Mustafa Emre Bakircioglu  53 Ralf Henkel  54   55 Hussein Kandil  56 Ege Can Serefoglu  57 Abdullah Alarbid  13 Akira Tsujimura  58 Alireza Kheradmand  59 Christina Anagnostopoulou  60 Angelo Marino  61 Aram Adamyan  62 Birute Zilaitiene  63 Cevahir Ozer  39 Edoardo Pescatori  64 Paraskevi Vogiatzi  65 Gian Maria Busetto  66 Giancarlo Balercia  67 Haitham Elbardisi  9   10 Hamed Akhavizadegan  68 Hesamoddin Sajadi  69 Hisanori Taniguchi  70 Hyun Jun Park  71   72 Israel Maldonado Rosas  73 Mohamed Al-Marhoon  74 Mohammad Ali Sadighi Gilani  69 Naif Alhathal  75 Germar-Michael Pinggera  76 Priyank Kothari  77 Nasser Mogharabian  78 Sava Micic  79 Sheryl Homa  80 Sara Darbandi  81   82 Tran Quang Tien Long  83 Wael Zohdy  10 Widi Atmoko  22 Marjan Sabbaghian  69 Wael Ibrahim  84 Ryan P Smith  85 Christopher Chee Kong Ho  86 Jean de la Rosette  87 Ahmed I El-Sakka  88 Mirko Preto  89 Cătălina Zenoaga-Barbăroșie  90 Saad Mohammed Abumelha  91 Aykut Baser  92 Kaan Aydos  93 Liliana Ramirez-Dominguez  73 Vijay Kumar  94 Teng Aik Ong  95 Tiago Cesar Mierzwa  96 Ricky Adriansjah  97 Saleem A Banihani  98 Kasonde Bowa  99 Shinichiro Fukuhara  100 Marcelo Rodriguez Peña  101 Mohamad Moussa  102   103 Umut Çağın Ari  104 Chak-Lam Cho  105 Nicholas N Tadros  106 Muhammet Rasit Ugur  107 Edouard Amar  108 Marco Falcone  109 Frederic Romain Santer  76 Arif Kalkanli  110 Keshab Kumar Karna  111 Kareim Khalafalla  9   112   113 Ranjit B Vishwakarma  114 Federica Finocchi  67 Carlo Giulioni  115 Erman Ceyhan  39 Gökhan Çeker  116 Chadi Yazbeck  117 Osvaldo Rajmil  118 Mehmet Yilmaz  119 Baris Altay  120 Trenton L Barrett  121 Kay Seong Ngoo  122 Shubhadeep Roychoudhury  123 Gianmaria Salvio  67 Haocheng Lin  124 Ates Kadioglu  125 Massimiliano Timpano  109 Tomer Avidor-Reiss  126   127 Lukman Hakim  128 Puneet Sindhwani  128 Giorgio Franco  129 Rajender Singh  130 Filippo Giacone  131 Mikhail Ruzaev  132 Raghavender Kosgi  133 Nikolaos Sofikitis  134 Ayad Palani  135 Gokhan Calik  87 Deniz Kulaksız  136 Davor Jezek  137 Manaf Al Hashmi  138   139 Panagiotis Drakopoulos  140   141 Huda Omran  142 Sofia Leonardi  143 Ciler Celik-Ozenci  144 Nur Dokuzeylül Güngör  145 Jonathan Ramsay  146 Toshiyasu Amano  147 Emrullah Sogutdelen  148 Gede Wirya Kusuma Duarsa  149 Koji Chiba  150 Sunil Jindal  151 Missy Savira  22 Luca Boeri  152 Edson Borges  153 Deepak Gupte  154 Fatih Gokalp  155 Guadalupe Hernández Hebrard  73 Suks Minhas  156 Rupin Shah  114 Global Andrology Forum
Affiliations

Controversy and Consensus on the Management of Elevated Sperm DNA Fragmentation in Male Infertility: A Global Survey, Current Guidelines, and Expert Recommendations

Ala'a Farkouh et al. World J Mens Health. 2023 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: Sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) has been associated with male infertility and poor outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART). The purpose of this study was to investigate global practices related to the management of elevated SDF in infertile men, summarize the relevant professional society recommendations, and provide expert recommendations for managing this condition.

Materials and methods: An online global survey on clinical practices related to SDF was disseminated to reproductive clinicians, according to the CHERRIES checklist criteria. Management protocols for various conditions associated with SDF were captured and compared to the relevant recommendations in professional society guidelines and the appropriate available evidence. Expert recommendations and consensus on the management of infertile men with elevated SDF were then formulated and adapted using the Delphi method.

Results: A total of 436 experts from 55 different countries submitted responses. As an initial approach, 79.1% of reproductive experts recommend lifestyle modifications for infertile men with elevated SDF, and 76.9% prescribe empiric antioxidants. Regarding antioxidant duration, 39.3% recommend 4-6 months and 38.1% recommend 3 months. For men with unexplained or idiopathic infertility, and couples experiencing recurrent miscarriages associated with elevated SDF, most respondents refer to ART 6 months after failure of conservative and empiric medical management. Infertile men with clinical varicocele, normal conventional semen parameters, and elevated SDF are offered varicocele repair immediately after diagnosis by 31.4%, and after failure of antioxidants and conservative measures by 40.9%. Sperm selection techniques and testicular sperm extraction are also management options for couples undergoing ART. For most questions, heterogenous practices were demonstrated.

Conclusions: This paper presents the results of a large global survey on the management of infertile men with elevated SDF and reveals a lack of consensus among clinicians. Furthermore, it demonstrates the scarcity of professional society guidelines in this regard and attempts to highlight the relevant evidence. Expert recommendations are proposed to help guide clinicians.

Keywords: DNA fragmentation; Delphi method; Disease management; Male infertility; Practice guideline; Survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Complete survey methodology. The complete survey consisted of 64 questions on SDF clinical practices divided into five sections: demographics, indications for SDF testing, technical aspects of SDF testing, management of elevated SDF, and barriers in incorporating SDF into clinical practice. A total of 18 recommendations were made as follows: seven for indications for SDF testing, ten for management of infertile men with elevated SDF, and one for technical aspects of SDF testing. Passing criteria for the Delphi method was set at >80% scoring the recommendation ≥7 in agreement. GAF: Global Andrology Forum, SDF: sperm DNA fragmentation.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. General approach to managing elevated SDF in infertile men. Respondents were allowed to select more than one answer. The percentage for each answer was calculated by dividing the number of respondents who had selected it by the total number of respondents who had answered this question (n=402). ART: assisted reproductive technology, ICSI: intracytoplasmic sperm injection, SDF: sperm DNA fragmentation.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Ordering a repeat SDF test as confirmation for elevated SDF, with results stratified according to the cost of SDF testing. The majority do not order a confirmation test regardless of the cost of testing, as there is no significant difference when responses were compared between costs less than $100 and more than $100 (p=0.2). SDF: sperm DNA fragmentation.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Duration of abstinence recommended by respondents as a means to lower SDF. ART: assisted reproductive technology, SDF: sperm DNA fragmentation.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. ART referral for men with unexplained infertility and elevated SDF. ART: assisted reproductive technology, SDF: sperm DNA fragmentation, UMI: unexplained male infertility.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. ART referral for men with idiopathic infertility and elevated SDF. ART: assisted reproductive technology, IMI: idiopathic male infertility, SDF: sperm DNA fragmentation.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. Management approach for those who have elevated SDF and are experiencing recurrent pregnancy loss after spontaneous conception. Respondents were allowed to select more than one answer. The percentage for each answer was calculated by dividing the number of respondents who had selected it by the total number of respondents who had answered this question (n=402). ART: assisted reproductive technology, ICSI: intracytoplasmic sperm injection, RPL: recurrent pregnancy loss, SDF: sperm DNA fragmentation.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8. ART referral for recurrent pregnancy loss and men with elevated SDF. ART: assisted reproductive technology, RPL: recurrent pregnancy loss, SDF: sperm DNA fragmentation.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9. Management approach for infertile men who have a clinical varicocele, normal conventional semen parameters, and elevated SDF. Respondents were allowed to select more than one answer. The percentage for each answer was calculated by dividing the number of respondents who had selected it by the total number of respondents who had answered this question (n=401). ART: assisted reproductive technology, SDF: sperm DNA fragmentation.
Fig. 10
Fig. 10. Varicocele repair for infertile men who have a clinical varicocele, normal conventional semen parameters and elevated SDF. ART: assisted reproductive technology, SDF: sperm DNA fragmentation.
Fig. 11
Fig. 11. ART referral for infertile men who have a clinical varicocele, normal conventional semen parameters, and elevated SDF. ART: assisted reproductive technology, SDF: sperm DNA fragmentation.
Fig. 12
Fig. 12. Varicocele repair for infertile men who have subclinical varicocele and elevated SDF. ART: assisted reproductive technology, SDF: sperm DNA fragmentation.
Fig. 13
Fig. 13. Prescribing antioxidants for infertile men with elevated SDF. SDF: sperm DNA fragmentation.
Fig. 14
Fig. 14. Conditions associated with elevated SDF in infertile men, for which antioxidants are prescribed. Respondents were allowed to select more than one answer. The percentage for each answer was calculated by dividing the number of respondents who had selected it by the total number of respondents who had answered this question (n=401). ART: assisted reproductive technology, IMI: idiopathic male infertility, RPL: recurrent pregnancy loss, SDF: sperm DNA fragmentation, UMI: unexplained male infertility.
Fig. 15
Fig. 15. Recommended duration of treatment with antioxidants for infertile men with elevated SDF. SDF: sperm DNA fragmentation.
Fig. 16
Fig. 16. Follow-up on the success of antioxidant therapy in the management of infertile men with elevated SDF. SDF: sperm DNA fragmentation.
Fig. 17
Fig. 17. Prescribing hormones for infertile men with elevated SDF. SDF: sperm DNA fragmentation.
Fig. 18
Fig. 18. Recommended duration of treatment with hormones for infertile men with elevated SDF. SDF: sperm DNA fragmentation.
Fig. 19
Fig. 19. Approach to miscarriage after IVF or ICSI and elevated SDF in the male partner. ICSI: intracytoplasmic sperm injection, IVF: in vitro fertilization, SDF: sperm DNA fragmentation.
Fig. 20
Fig. 20. Recommending sperm selection techniques for infertile men with elevated SDF. SDF: sperm DNA fragmentation.
Fig. 21
Fig. 21. Sperm selection techniques recommended by the respondents. Respondents were allowed to select more than one answer. The percentage for each answer was calculated by dividing the number of respondents who had selected it by the total number of respondents who had answered this question (n=401). SDF: sperm DNA fragmentation.
Fig. 22
Fig. 22. Recommending testicular for infertile men with elevated SDF undergoing ICSI. ICSI: intracytoplasmic sperm injection, SDF: sperm DNA fragmentation.
Fig. 23
Fig. 23. Responses to when experts would recommend testicular sperm if they do for infertile men with elevated SDF. ICSI: intracytoplasmic sperm injection, SDF: sperm DNA fragmentation.
Fig. 24
Fig. 24. Reasons for recommending against the use of testicular sperm for infertile men with elevated SDF. Respondents were allowed to select more than one answer. The percentage for each answer is calculated by dividing the number of respondents who have selected it by the total number of respondents who have answered this question (n=341). SDF: sperm DNA fragmentation.
Fig. 25
Fig. 25. Treatment strategies for infertile men with elevated SDF. ICSI: intracytoplasmic sperm injection, SDF: sperm DNA fragmentation.

References

    1. Agarwal A, Mulgund A, Hamada A, Chyatte MR. A unique view on male infertility around the globe. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:37. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S, Racowsky C, de Mouzon J, Sokol R, et al. The international glossary on infertility and fertility care, 2017. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:1786–1801. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang C, Swerdloff RS. Limitations of semen analysis as a test of male fertility and anticipated needs from newer tests. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:1502–1507. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agarwal A, Allamaneni SS. Sperm DNA damage assessment: a test whose time has come. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:850–853. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization (WHO) WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 6th ed. Geneva: WHO; 2021.