Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2023 Jun;128(12):2163-2164.
doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02289-9. Epub 2023 Apr 29.

Precision medicine for prostate cancer-improved outcome prediction for low-intermediate risk disease using a six-gene copy number alteration classifier

Affiliations
Editorial

Precision medicine for prostate cancer-improved outcome prediction for low-intermediate risk disease using a six-gene copy number alteration classifier

William Lautert-Dutra et al. Br J Cancer. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

A multiplex 6-gene copy number classifier was used to distinguish between low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients. The study analysed a cohort of 448 patients and previously published datasets from radical prostatectomies. The classifier performs better than conventional stratification methods, is low cost, and can be performed easily in clinical laboratories.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Development of prostate cancer six-gene classifier for accurate prediction of recurrence in patients with low-intermediate disease.
Schematic depiction of gene copy number selection for classifier using Random Forest survival and Cox proportional hazard modelling. Genes are shown in blue = loss and red = gain. The cohort analysis involved double sampling using needle cores from differing Gleason score regions (A and B) that can address variation in tumour sampling due to technical issues or genetic heterogeneity. Analysis of CNAs for all six genes from both needle core samples was used to determine the risk of recurrence. The classifier’s performance was compared to the CAPRA-S risk score and four public domain outcome cohorts.

References

    1. Litwin MS, Tan HJ. The diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. JAMA. 2017;317:2532. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7248. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Loeb S, Bjurlin MA, Nicholson J, Tammela TL, Penson DF, Carter HB, et al. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2014;65:1046–55. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.062. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ebrahimizadeh W, Guérard KP, Rouzbeh S, Bramhecha YM, Scarlata E, Brimo F, et al. Design and development of a fully synthetic multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification–based probe mix for detection of copy number alterations in prostate cancer formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples. J Mol Diagn. 2020;22:1246–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.07.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu W, Hou J, Petkewicz J, Na R, Wang C, Sun J, et al. Feasibility and performance of a novel probe panel to detect somatic DNA copy number alterations in clinical specimens for predicting prostate cancer progression. Prostate. 2020;80:1253–62. doi: 10.1002/pros.24057. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fu X, Shi Y, Ma J, Zhang K, Wang G, Li G, et al. Advances of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification technology in molecular diagnostics. Biotechniques. 2022;73:205–13. doi: 10.2144/btn-2022-0017. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types