Platelet-rich Plasma for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial
- PMID: 37120727
- PMCID: PMC10330773
- DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003481
Platelet-rich Plasma for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial
Abstract
Purpose: We assessed the safety and efficacy of 2 injections of platelet-rich plasma for treating mild to moderate erectile dysfunction by conducting a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Materials and methods: Men with mild to moderate erectile dysfunction (International Index of Erectile Function scores 11-25) were randomized to receive either 2 injections of platelet-rich plasma or placebo separated by 1 month. Primary outcome was percentage of men meeting minimum clinically important difference at 1 month after the second injection. Secondary outcomes were change in International Index of Erectile Function at 1, 3, and 6 months, and changes in penile vascular parameters and adverse events at 6 months.
Results: We randomized 61 men: 28 into platelet-rich plasma and 33 into placebo. There was no difference between groups in percentage of men meeting minimum clinically important difference at 1 month: 14 (58.3%) in platelet-rich plasma vs 15 (53.6%) in placebo (P = .730). Mean International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain changed from 17.4 (95% CI 15.8-19.0) to 21 (17.9-24.0) at 1 month in men receiving platelet-rich plasma, vs 18.6 (17.3-19.8) to 21.6 (19.1-24.1) in the placebo group; however, there was no significant difference between groups (P = .756). There were no major adverse events and only 1 minor adverse event in each group. There were no changes in penile Doppler parameters from baseline to 6 months.
Conclusions: The results of our prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial suggest that 2 injections of intracavernosal platelet-rich plasma separated by 1 month in men with mild to moderate erectile dysfunction is safe, but we found no difference in efficacy between platelet-rich plasma and placebo.
Keywords: clinical trial; erectile dysfunction; platelet-rich plasma.
Conflict of interest statement
COMPETING INTERESTS
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Comment in
-
Platelet-rich Plasma for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial. Letter.J Urol. 2023 Nov;210(5):733-734. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003684. Epub 2023 Sep 6. J Urol. 2023. PMID: 37671736 No abstract available.
-
Re: Platelet-rich Plasma for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial.Eur Urol. 2024 Jan;85(1):93. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.08.018. Epub 2023 Sep 9. Eur Urol. 2024. PMID: 37696736 No abstract available.
References
-
- Derby CA, et al., Measurement of erectile dysfunction in population-based studies: the use of a single question self-assessment in the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. Int J Impot Res, 2000. 12(4): p. 197–204. - PubMed
-
- Burnett AL, et al., Erectile Dysfunction: AUA Guideline. J Urol, 2018. 200(3): p. 633–641. - PubMed
-
- Carvalheira AA, et al., Dropout in the treatment of erectile dysfunction with PDE5: a study on predictors and a qualitative analysis of reasons for discontinuation. J Sex Med, 2012. 9(9): p. 2361–9. - PubMed
-
- Baria M, et al., Cellular Components and Growth Factor Content of Platelet-Rich Plasma With a Customizable Commercial System. Am J Sports Med, 2019. 47(5): p. 1216–1222. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
