Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Mar 28;44(2):95-105.
doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1767669. eCollection 2023 May.

Combining Multiple Psychophysiological Measures of Listening Effort: Challenges and Recommendations

Affiliations
Review

Combining Multiple Psychophysiological Measures of Listening Effort: Challenges and Recommendations

Michael Richter et al. Semin Hear. .

Abstract

About one-third of all recently published studies on listening effort have used at least one physiological measure, providing evidence of the popularity of such measures in listening effort research. However, the specific measures employed, as well as the rationales used to justify their inclusion, vary greatly between studies, leading to a literature that is fragmented and difficult to integrate. A unified approach that assesses multiple psychophysiological measures justified by a single rationale would be preferable because it would advance our understanding of listening effort. However, such an approach comes with a number of challenges, including the need to develop a clear definition of listening effort that links to specific physiological measures, customized equipment that enables the simultaneous assessment of multiple measures, awareness of problems caused by the different timescales on which the measures operate, and statistical approaches that minimize the risk of type-I error inflation. This article discusses in detail the various obstacles for combining multiple physiological measures in listening effort research and provides recommendations on how to overcome them.

Keywords: listening demand; listening effort; psychophysiological measure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest There are no conflicts of interest, financial, or otherwise.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Time characteristics of selected physiological measures. Dark gray lines indicate continuous measures; dark gray dots indicate noncontinuous measures. Dark gray dots with surrounding light gray boxes indicate noncontinuous measures that refer to time periods and not to specific points in time. The light gray boxes indicate the measurement epochs required to obtain the measure.

References

    1. Paul B T, Chen J, Le T, Lin V, Dimitrijevic A. Cortical alpha oscillations in cochlear implant users reflect subjective listening effort during speech-in-noise perception. PLoS One. 2021;16(07):e0254162. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wisniewski M G, Zakrzewski A C, Bell D R, Wheeler M. EEG power spectral dynamics associated with listening in adverse conditions. Psychophysiology. 2021;58(09):e13877. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hunter C R. Tracking cognitive spare capacity during speech perception with EEG/ERP: effects of cognitive load and sentence predictability. Ear Hear. 2020;41(05):1144–1157. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Silcox J W, Payne B R. The costs (and benefits) of effortful listening on context processing: a simultaneous electrophysiology, pupillometry, and behavioral study. Cortex. 2021;142:296–316. - PubMed
    1. Rovetti J, Goy H, Pichora-Fuller M K, Russo F A.Functional near-infrared spectroscopy as a measure of listening effort in older adults who use hearing aids Trends Hear 2019232331216519886722 - PMC - PubMed