Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Apr 13:14:1128250.
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1128250. eCollection 2023.

Effect of unilateral training and bilateral training on physical performance: A meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Effect of unilateral training and bilateral training on physical performance: A meta-analysis

Wenfeng Zhang et al. Front Physiol. .

Abstract

Background: In Unilateral (UNI) exercises are more effective than bilateral (BI) exercises in improving athletic performance is debatable. Objectives: this meta-analysis investigated the effects of UNI and BI exercises on different effect indicators of jump ability, sprint ability, maximal force, change of direction ability, and balance ability. Data Sources: PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of science, CNKI, Proquest, Wan Fang Data. Study Eligibility Criteria: To be eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis, the study had to be: 1) athletes; 2) UNI training and BI training; 3) the intervention period had to be more than 6 weeks and the intervention frequency had to be more than 2 times/week; 4) the outcome indicators were jumping ability, sprinting ability, maximum strength, and change of direction and balance. Study Appraisal and Synthesis Method: We used the random-effects model for meta-analyses. Effect sizes (standardized mean difference), calculated from measures of horizontally oriented performance, were represented by the standardized mean difference and presented alongside 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: A total of 28 papers met the inclusion criteria, and Meta-analysis showed that UNI training was more effective than BI training in improving jumping ability (ES = 0.61.0.23 to 0.09; Z = 3.12, p = 0.002 < 0.01), sprinting ability (ES = -0.02, -0.03 to -0.01; Z = 2.73, p = 0.006 < 0.01), maximum strength (ES = 8.95,2.30 to 15.61; Z = 2.64, p = 0.008 > 0.05), change of direction ability (ES = -0.03, -0.06 to 0.00; Z = 1.90, p = 0.06 > 0.01) and balance ability (ES = 1.41,-0.62 to 3.44; Z = 1.36, p = 0.17 > 0.01). The results of the analysis of moderating variables showed that intervention period, intervention frequency and intervention types all had different indicators of effect on exercise performance. Conclusion: UNI training has a more significant effect on jumping and strength quality for unilateral power patterns, and BI training has a more significant effect on jumping and strength quality for bilateral power patterns.

Keywords: ability; bilateral exercises; explosive power; maximal force; unilateral exercises.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flowchart for inclusion and exclusion of studies.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Intergroup Forest plots of UNI and BI training affecting Maximal Force. RESS = rear elevated split squat; LS-L = lunge squat with left leg; LS-R = lunge squat with right leg; BLD = bended-leg deadlift; BS = Bulgarian Squat; RD = Romanion deadlift; SLRD = Single-Leg Romanion deadlift.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Intergroup Forest plots of UNI and BI training affecting jumping ability. CMJ = countermovement jump; CMJ-L = countermovement jump with left leg; CMJ-R = countermovement jump with right leg; CMJd = countermovement jump with dominant leg; CMJnd = countermovement jump with non-dominant leg; CMJ-S = countermovement jump with single leg; SLJ = standing long jump; SLJ-L = standing long jump with left leg; SLJ-R = standing long jump with right leg; SLJd = standing long jump with dominant leg; SLJnd = standing long jump with non-dominant leg; SLJ-S = standing long jump with single leg; VJ = vertical jump; VJ-L = vertical jump with left leg; VJ-R = vertical jump with right leg; VJd = vertical jump with dominant leg; ARTH-D = assisted running double feet touch high; ARTH-S = assisted running single foot touch high; HRJ = highest reach jump; HRJ-S = highest reach jump with single leg; HC3J = cross and horizontal triple jump; H3J = horizontal triple jump; H3J-R = horizontal triple jump with right leg; H3Jd = horizontal triple jump with dominant leg; H3Jnd = horizontal triple jump with non-dominant leg; HJ-L = horizontal jump with left leg; HJ-R = horizontal jump with right leg; TARTH = three-step assisted running touch high; H3CMJ = triple bilateral horizontal jump with arm swing; HCMJ = bilateral horizontal jump with arm swing; CVJ = countermovement vertical jump; CVJ-L = countermovement vertical jump with left leg; CVJ-R = countermovement vertical jump with right leg; SJ = squat jump; SJd = squat jump with dominant leg; SJnd = squat jump with non-dominant leg; OARTH = one-step assisted running touch high.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Intergroup Forest plots of UNI and BI training affecting sprinting ability.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Intergroup Forest plots of UNI and BI training affecting Change of Direction Ability. 505-L = 505 change-of-direction speed test with left leg; 505-R = 505 change of direction speed test with right leg; COD = change-of-direction test; Pro = pro-agility test; COD180 = time in 5 + 5 m sprint change of direction of 180°; COD180d = time in 5 + 5 m sprint change of direction of 180° with dominant leg; COD180d = time in 5 + 5 m sprint change of direction of 180° with non-dominant leg; COD90d = time in 5 + 5 m sprint change of direction of 90° with dominant leg; COD90d = time in 5 + 5 m sprint change of direction of 90° with non-dominant leg; COD-L = change-of-direction test with left leg; COD-R = change-of-direction test with right leg; Illinois = Illinois test; V-cut = 25-m sprint with 4 changes of direction of 45°; C10-L = 10 m with left leg with a COD of 180°; C10-R = 10 m with right leg with a COD of 180°; C20-L = 20 m with left leg with a COD of 180°; C20-R = 20 m with right leg with a COD of 180°; C25-L = 25 m with left leg with a COD of 180°; C25-R = 25 m with right leg with a COD of 180°; t-test = T-figure route agility test; t-test = T-figure route agility test with dominant leg; t-test = T-figure route agility test with non-dominant leg.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Intergroup Forest plots of UNI and BI training affecting Balance Performance. YBT-LC = Y-Balance test of left comprehensive; YBT-RC = Y-Balance test of right comprehensive; YBT-LBM = Y-Balance test of left back middle; YBT-LBO = Y-Balance test of left back outer; YBT-LF = Y-Balance test of left front; YBT-RBM = Y-Balance test of right back middle; YBT-RBO = Y-Balance test of right back outer; YBT-RF = Y-Balance test of right front; SEBT-LB = star excursion balance test in the left posterior-lateral direction; SEBT-LF = star excursion balance test in the left anterior direction; SEBT-RB = star excursion balance test in the right posterior-lateral direction; SEBT-RF = star excursion balance test in the right anterior direction.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abston L. (2020a). A comparison of unilateral and bilateral sagittal plane plyometrics on power outcomes in collegiate powerlifters. Louisiana, United States: University of Louisiana at Lafayette.
    1. Ahmad T., Jain D. R. (2020). Effects of lower body plyometric training in young Kashmiri female volleyball players. Int. J. Phys. Educ. Sports Health 7, 151–156.
    1. Anders J. P., Keller J. L., Smith C. P., Hill E. C., Neltner T. J., Housh T. J., et al. (2020). Performance fatigability and neuromuscular responses for bilateral versus unilateral leg extensions in women. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol 50, 102367. 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102367 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson K. G., Behm D. G. (2004). Maintenance of EMG activity and loss of force output with instability. J. Strength Cond. Res. 18, 637–640. 10.1519/1533-4287(2004)18<637:MOEAAL>2.0.CO;2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson K. G., Behm D. G. (2005). Trunk muscle activity increases with unstable squat movements. Can. J. Appl. Physiol. 30, 33–45. 10.1139/h05-103 - DOI - PubMed