Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 20;4(4):232-240.
doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2023.01.003. eCollection 2023 Apr.

Transvenous lead extractions in a single high-volume center over a 24-year period: High success rate and low complication rate

Thomas Morgan Knutsen  1 , Per Torger Skretteberg  1 , Paul Vanberg  1 , Ziaullah Kamal  1 , Sigrun Halvorsen  1   2 , Knut Liestøl  3 , Torkel Steen  1 , Eivind Platou  1
Affiliations

Transvenous lead extractions in a single high-volume center over a 24-year period: High success rate and low complication rate

Thomas Morgan Knutsen et al. Heart Rhythm O2. .

Abstract

Background: Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) procedures can be complicated and are associated with a small but significant risk of cardiovascular complications. However, methods and tools vary among centers.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to the present the methods and results of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator TLE procedures in our center over a 24-year period.

Methods: From April 1997 through 2020, we attempted to extract 2964 leads in 1780 procedures and 1642 patients. We mainly utilized single sheath technique using snaring or mechanical rotational sheaths and steel sheaths when necessary. Difficult procedures were performed by an experienced cardiologist, and close supervision was emphasized. Most of the extractions were performed using local anesthesia with sedation.

Results: Median age of patients was 65.0 [interquartile range 20.00] years, and median dwelling time of leads was 5.0 [7.0] years. Clinical success was achieved in 1739 procedures (97.7%) and complete technical success in 2841 leads (95.8%). Clinical success (leaving <4 cm of the lead in the body and achieving the clinical goal for the patient) was achieved for 79 leads (2.7%). TLE failed in 44 leads (1.1%) and 41 procedures (2.3%) among 36 patients (2.2%). There were 23 cases (1.3%) of major complications, with only 1 death directly related to the procedure (<0.1%). In addition, 2 patients with sepsis died within the first 24 hours after the procedure. No caval tears occurred.

Conclusion: Single sheath lead extractions utilizing snaring or mechanical rotational sheaths were effective and safe in our high-volume center as performed by experienced operators.

Keywords: High-volume center; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Pacemaker; Single sheath; Transvenous lead extraction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Main results in percentage of total number of transvenous lead extraction procedures. For procedural outcome, clinical success is shown in green and failure in red. For complications, major complications shown in red, minor or observation in yellow, and no complication in green.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of transvenous lead extraction procedures each year. Total number shown in bars with blue borders. Number of transvenous lead extractions with achieved clinical success shown in green bars and number of failed transvenous lead extractions in red bars.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Number of transvenous lead extraction procedures each year involving specific extraction tools. Mechanical sheaths—mechanical rotating dilator sheath (Cook Evolution or Spectranetics TightRail)—are shown in blue. Steel sheaths shown in red and snaring in green. Polypropylene and locking stylets were used in most procedures and are not shown.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mond H.G., Proclemer A. The 11th world survey of cardiac pacing and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: calendar year 2009—a World Society of Arrhythmia's project. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011;34:1013–1027. - PubMed
    1. Raatikainen M.J., Arnar D.O., Zeppenfeld K., Merino J.L., Kuck K.H., Hindricks G. Current trends in the use of cardiac implantable electronic devices and interventional electrophysiological procedures in the European Society of Cardiology member countries: 2015 report from the European Heart Rhythm Association. Europace. 2015;17(Suppl 4):72. iv1. - PubMed
    1. Deshmukh A, Patel N, Noseworthy PA, et al. Trends in use and adverse outcomes associated with transvenous lead removal in the United States. Circulation 2015132:2363–2371. - PubMed
    1. Sridhar A.R., Lavu M., Yarlagadda V., et al. Cardiac implantable electronic device-related infection and extraction trends in the U.S. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;40:286–293. - PubMed
    1. Wazni O., Wilkoff B.L. Considerations for cardiac device lead extraction. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016;13:221–229. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources