Challenges in Estimating the Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccination Using Observational Data
- PMID: 37126810
- PMCID: PMC10152408
- DOI: 10.7326/M21-4269
Challenges in Estimating the Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccination Using Observational Data
Erratum in
-
Correction: Challenges in Estimating the Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccination Using Observational Data.Ann Intern Med. 2023 Jul;176(7):1016. doi: 10.7326/L23-0217. Epub 2023 Jun 6. Ann Intern Med. 2023. PMID: 37276606 No abstract available.
Abstract
The COVID-19 vaccines were developed and rigorously evaluated in randomized trials during 2020. However, important questions, such as the magnitude and duration of protection, their effectiveness against new virus variants, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination, could not be answered by randomized trials and have therefore been addressed in observational studies. Analyses of observational data can be biased because of confounding and because of inadequate design that does not consider the evolution of the pandemic over time and the rapid uptake of vaccination. Emulating a hypothetical "target trial" using observational data assembled during vaccine rollouts can help manage such potential sources of bias. This article describes 2 approaches to target trial emulation. In the sequential approach, on each day, eligible persons who have not yet been vaccinated are matched to a vaccinated person. The single-trial approach sets a single baseline at the start of the rollout and considers vaccination as a time-varying variable. The nature of the confounding depends on the analysis strategy: Estimating "per-protocol" effects (accounting for vaccination of initially unvaccinated persons after baseline) may require adjustment for both baseline and "time-varying" confounders. These issues are illustrated by using observational data from 2 780 931 persons in the United Kingdom aged 70 years or older to estimate the effect of a first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. Addressing the issues discussed in this article should help authors of observational studies provide robust evidence to guide clinical and policy decisions.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures


References
-
- UK Health Security Agency. COVID-19: the green book, chapter 14a. 27 November 2020. Accessed at www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-the-green-book-chapter-14a on 13 May 2021.
-
- Hall VJ, Foulkes S, Saei A, et al; SIREN Study Group. COVID-19 vaccine coverage in health-care workers in England and effectiveness of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against infection (SIREN): a prospective, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet. 2021;397:1725-1735. [PMID: ] doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00790-X - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Lopez Bernal J, Andrews N, Gower C, et al. Effectiveness of the Pfizer–BioNTech and Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccines on Covid-19 related symptoms, hospital admissions, and mortality in older adults in England: test negative case-control study. BMJ. 2021;373:n1088. [PMID: ] doi:10.1136/bmj.n1088 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical