Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Provider Use of a Novel Machine Learning Model for Favorable Outcome Prediction
- PMID: 37128409
- PMCID: PMC10148285
Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Provider Use of a Novel Machine Learning Model for Favorable Outcome Prediction
Abstract
Predictive models may be particularly beneficial to clinicians when they face uncertainty and seek to develop a mental model of disease progression, but we know little about the post-implementation effects of predictive models on clinicians' experience of their work. Combining survey and interview methods, we found that providers using a predictive algorithm reported being significantly less uncertain and better able to anticipate, plan and prepare for patient discharge than non-users. The tool helped hospitalists form and develop confidence in their mental models of a novel disease (Covid-19). Yet providers' attention to the predictive tool declined as their confidence in their own mental models grew. Predictive algorithms that not only offer data but also provide feedback on decisions, thus supporting providers' motivation for continuous learning, hold promise for more sustained provider attention and cognition augmentation.
©2022 AMIA - All rights reserved.
References
-
- Ivankova NV, Creswell JW, Stick SL. Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field methods. 2006 Feb;18(1):3–20.
-
- Creswell JW, Klassen AC, Plano Clark VL, Smith KC. Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. Bethesda (Maryland): National Institutes of Health. 2011 Aug 1;2013:541–5.
-
- Woolley CM. Meeting the mixed methods challenge of integration in a sociological study of structure and agency. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2009 Jan;3(1):7–25.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical