Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep;67(9):893-900.
doi: 10.1111/jir.13039. Epub 2023 May 2.

Development and initial psychometric properties of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale-Intellectual Disability version

K Scior  1 , M Patel  1 , A Goldsmith-Sumner  1 , N Hayden  2 , J Y Lee  1 , Y Lunsky  3 , M Osborne  1 , L Richardson  1 , S Stewart-Brown  4 , R P Hastings  2
Affiliations
Free article

Development and initial psychometric properties of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale-Intellectual Disability version

K Scior et al. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2023 Sep.
Free article

Abstract

Background: The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS; Tennant et al., 2007) is yet to be validated in the intellectual disability (ID) population. The aim of this study was to report the development process and assess the psychometric properties of a newly adapted version of the WEMWBS and the Short WEMWBS for individuals with mild to moderate IDs (WEMWBS-ID/SWEMWBS-ID).

Method: The WEMWBS item wordings and response options were revised by clinicians and researchers expert in the field of ID, and a visual aid was added to the scale. The adapted version was reviewed by 10 individuals with IDs. The measure was administered by researchers online using screenshare, to individuals aged 16+ years with mild to moderate IDs. Data from three UK samples were collated to evaluate the WEMWBS-ID (n = 96). A subsample (n = 22) completed the measure again 1 to 2 weeks later to assess test-retest reliability, and 95 participants additionally completed an adapted version of the adapted Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale to examine convergent validity. Additional data from a Canadian sample (n = 27) were used to evaluate the SWEMWBS-ID (n = 123).

Results: The WEMWBS-ID demonstrated good internal consistency (ω = 0.77-0.87), excellent test-retest reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = .88] and good convergent validity with the self-esteem scale (r = .48-.60) across samples. A confirmatory factor analysis for a single factor model demonstrated an adequate fit. The SWEMWBS-ID showed poor to good internal consistency (ω = 0.36-0.74), moderate test-retest reliability (ICC = .67) and good convergent validity (r = .48-.60) across samples, and a confirmatory factor analysis indicated good model fit for a single factor structure.

Conclusions: The WEMWBS-ID and short version demonstrated promising psychometric properties, when administered virtually by a researcher. Further exploration of the scales with larger, representative samples is warranted.

Keywords: Intellectual disability; Measurement; Mental wellbeing; Psychometric properties.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bass M., Dawkin M., Muncer S., Vigurs S. & Bostock J. (2016) Validation of Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) in a population of people using secondary care mental health services. Journal of Mental Health 25, 323-329.
    1. Dagnan D. & Sandhu S. (1999) Social comparison, self-esteem and depression in people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 43, 372-379.
    1. Faculty of Public Health and Mental Health Foundation (2016) Better mental health for all: a public health approach to mental health improvement. London.
    1. Fang J., Fleck M. P., Green A., McVilly K., Hao Y., Tan W. et al. (2011) The response scale for the intellectual disability module of the WHOQOL: 5-point or 3-point? Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 55, 537-549.
    1. Fenn K. & Scior K. (2019) The psychological and social impact of self-advocacy group membership on people with intellectual disabilities: a literature review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 32, 1349-1358.

Publication types