Validation of a prediction model for post-chemotherapy fibrosis in nonseminoma patients
- PMID: 37129962
- DOI: 10.1111/bju.16040
Validation of a prediction model for post-chemotherapy fibrosis in nonseminoma patients
Abstract
Objective: To validate Vergouwe's prediction model using the Swedish and Norwegian Testicular Cancer Group (SWENOTECA) RETROP database and to define its clinical utility.
Materials and methods: Vergouwe's prediction model for benign histopathology in post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) uses the following variables: presence of teratoma in orchiectomy specimen; pre-chemotherapy level of alpha-fetoprotein; β-Human chorionic gonadotropin and lactate dehydrogenase; and lymph node size pre- and post-chemotherapy. Our validation cohort consisted of patients included in RETROP, a prospective population-based database of patients in Sweden and Norway with metastatic nonseminoma, who underwent PC-RPLND in the period 2007-2014. Discrimination and calibration analyses were used to validate Vergouwe's prediction model results. Calibration plots were created and a Hosmer-Lemeshow test was calculated. Clinical utility, expressed as opt-out net benefit (NBopt-out ), was analysed using decision curve analysis.
Results: Overall, 284 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 130 (46%) had benign histology after PC-RPLND. Discrimination analysis showed good reproducibility, with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.77-0.87) compared to Vergouwe's prediction model (AUC between 0.77 and 0.84). Calibration was acceptable with no recalibration. Using a prediction threshold of 70% for benign histopathology, NBopt-out was 0.098. Using the model and this threshold, 61 patients would have been spared surgery. However, only 51 of 61 were correctly classified as benign.
Conclusions: The model was externally validated with good reproducibility. In a clinical setting, the model may identify patients with a high chance of benign histopathology, thereby sparing patients of surgery. However, meticulous follow-up is required.
Keywords: clinical decision rules; forecasting; germ cell and embryonal; lymph node excision; neoplasms; nonseminomatous germ cell tumour; testicular neoplasms.
© 2023 The Authors. BJU International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International.
References
-
- Heidenreich A, Pfister D, Witthuhn R, Thuer D, Albers P. Postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in advanced testicular cancer: radical or modified template resection. Eur Urol 2009; 55: 217-24
-
- Donohue JP, Thornhill JA, Foster RS, Rowland RG, Bihrle R. Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for clinical stage A testis cancer (1965 to 1989): modifications of technique and impact on ejaculation. J Urol 1993; 149: 237-43
-
- Gerdtsson A, Thor A, Grenabo Bergdahl A et al. Unilateral or bilateral retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in nonseminoma patients with postchemotherapy residual tumour? Results from RETROP, a population-based mapping study by the Swedish Norwegian Testicular Cancer Group. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 5: 235-43
-
- Gerdtsson A, Hakansson U, Tornblom M et al. Surgical complications in postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for nonseminoma germ cell tumour: a population-based study from the Swedish Norwegian Testicular Cancer Group. Eur Urol Oncol 2020; 3: 382-9
-
- Leao R, Nayan M, Punjani N et al. A new model to predict benign histology in residual retroperitoneal masses after chemotherapy in nonseminoma. Eur Urol Focus 2018; 4: 995-1001
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical