Outcomes of Proximal Versus Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a Western Center Experience
- PMID: 37130980
- DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05686-w
Outcomes of Proximal Versus Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a Western Center Experience
Abstract
Purpose: In this western study, we aimed to compare perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications, and overall survival in patients who underwent total gastrectomy (TG) or proximal gastrectomy (PG) for proximal gastric cancer (GC).
Methods: Patients who underwent GC surgery at Marmara University Hospital between January 2014 and December 2021 were evaluated retrospectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the baseline characteristics of patients undergoing PG and TG. Data on patients' demographics, clinicopathological features of tumors, complications, and survival rates were analyzed. Perioperative outcomes and overall survival of the patients were compared between PG and TG groups.
Results: A total of 212 patients were included in this study, with 53 patients in the PG and 159 in the TG group. After 1:1 matching according to PSM, 46 patients in the PG group were matched to 46 in the TG group. After PSM, there were no differences in clinicopathological outcomes except retrieved lymph nodes. In terms of short-term outcomes, overall perioperative morbidity (Clavien Dindo ≥ 3a) was significantly higher in the PG group (p = 0.01). However, there was no significant difference when the complications were considered separately. In the long-term follow-up, reflux esophagitis was associated with the PG group (p=0.04). In multivariate analysis, positive surgical margin and lymphovascular invasion were significant factors related to overall survival. Overall, 5-year survival was 55% in matched patients. The difference in survival was not statistically significant (57 vs. 69 months, p = 0.3) between the two groups.
Conclusions: Proximal gastrectomy is applicable to patients up to stage 3 disease, with no difference in overall survival, with caution in early complications and reflux esophagitis. Among all demographic and oncological factors, lymphovascular invasion and resection margin were significantly associated with worse survival.
Keywords: Carcinoma stomach; Gastrectomy; Proximal gastrectomy; Proximal gastric cancer; Total gastrectomy.
© 2023. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.
Similar articles
-
Total vs proximal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the upper third of the stomach: a propensity-score-matched analysis of a multicenter western experience (On behalf of the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer-GIRCG).Gastric Cancer. 2018 Sep;21(5):845-852. doi: 10.1007/s10120-018-0804-3. Epub 2018 Feb 8. Gastric Cancer. 2018. PMID: 29423892
-
[Short-term outcomes and long-term quality of life after undergoing radical proximal gastrectomy with esophageal gastric tube anastomosis and total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis for Siewert type II and III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: A propensity score matching analysis].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Feb 25;26(2):181-190. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20220728-00330. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023. PMID: 36797565 Chinese.
-
Can Proximal Gastrectomy with Double-Tract Reconstruction Replace Total Gastrectomy? A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Mar;24(3):516-524. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04195-z. Epub 2019 Apr 1. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020. PMID: 30937710
-
Clinical Outcomes of Proximal Gastrectomy versus Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Dig Surg. 2021;38(1):1-13. doi: 10.1159/000506104. Epub 2020 Nov 5. Dig Surg. 2021. PMID: 33152740
-
The role of proximal gastrectomy in gastric cancer.Chin Clin Oncol. 2022 Oct;11(5):39. doi: 10.21037/cco-22-82. Chin Clin Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36336898 Review.
References
-
- Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Rosa F, Quero G, Fiorillo C, Bissolati M, Cipollari C, Rausei S, et al. Total vs proximal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the upper third of the stomach: a propensity-score-matched analysis of a multicenter western experience (On behalf of the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer-GIRCG). Gastric Cancer. 2018;21(5):845-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-018-0804-3 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Zhao L, Ling R, Chen J, Shi A, Chai C, Ma F, et al. Clinical Outcomes of Proximal Gastrectomy versus Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Dig Surg. 2021;38(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1159/000506104 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Tian P, Liu Y, Bian S, Li M, Zhang M, Liu J, et al. Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol. 2020;10:607922. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.607922 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- An JY, Youn HG, Choi MG, Noh JH, Sohn TS, Kim S. The difficult choice between total and proximal gastrectomy in proximal early gastric cancer. Am J Surg. 2008;196(4):587-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.09.040 . - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous