Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2023 Dec;33(8):3373-3377.
doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03563-5. Epub 2023 May 2.

Midshaft clavicle fractures: is anterior plating an acceptable alternative to superior plating?

Brian H Mullis  1 , Kyle J Jeray  2 , Scott Broderick  3 , Stephanie L Tanner  2 , Becky G Snider  2 , Joshua Everhart  4 ; Southeastern Fracture Consortium
Affiliations
Observational Study

Midshaft clavicle fractures: is anterior plating an acceptable alternative to superior plating?

Brian H Mullis et al. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether anterior plating is better tolerated than superior plating for midshaft clavicle fractures.

Methods: This was a prospective non-randomized observational cohort study following operative vs. non-operative management of clavicle fractures from 2003 to 2018 at 7 level 1 academic trauma centers in the USA. The subset of patients treated with plate and screws is the basis for this comparative study. Adults aged 18-85 with closed clavicle fractures displaced over 100% or shortened by more than 1.5 cm were eligible for enrollment. Patients were followed for 2 years following enrollment. Allowable fixation methods at the discretion of the surgeon consisted of anterior-inferior or superior plating. A total of 412 patients were enrolled. Of these, 192 patients received either superior or anterior plating for a displaced clavicle fracture with complete documented prospective research forms capturing type of plating technique. The primary outcome measure was hardware removal (HWR). Secondary outcomes were Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and Visual Analog Pain (VAP) score, and satisfaction score (1 = high satisfaction; 5 = low satisfaction).

Results: There was no difference in HWR rates (7.1% superior 9/127; 6.2% anterior 4/65, p = 0.81), VAP score (mean 1.5 SD 1.0 superior; mean 1.7 SD 0.6 anterior, p = 0.21), DASH score (mean 7.5 SD 12.4 superior; mean 5.2 SD 15.2 anterior; p = 0.18) or satisfaction score (mean 1.6 SD 1.0 superior; mean 1.7 SD 0.60 anterior, p = 0.18).

Conclusion: There is no difference in HWR rates or functional outcomes when using a superior vs. anterior plating technique.

Keywords: Anterior; Clavicle; Fracture; Hardware; Removal; Superior.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Postacchini F, Gumina S, De Santis P, Albo F (2002) Epidemiology of clavicle fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:452–456 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nordqvist, A. & Petersson, C. (1994): The incidence of fractures of the clavicle. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 127–132
    1. Trauma CO, S. (2007) Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1–10 - DOI
    1. Zlowodzki M et al (2005) Treatment of acute midshaft clavicle fractures: systematic review of 2144 fractures: on behalf of the evidence-based orthopaedic Trauma Working Group. J Orthop Trauma 19:504–507 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kloen P, Sorkin AT, Rubel IF, Helfet DL (2002) Anteroinferior plating of midshaft clavicular nonunions. J Orthop Trauma 16:425–430 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources