Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jul 19;15(1-2):e1008.
doi: 10.4073/csr.2019.3. eCollection 2019 Jun.

Individualized funding interventions to improve health and social care outcomes for people with a disability: A mixed-methods systematic review

Pádraic Fleming  1 , Sinead McGilloway  1 , Marian Hernon  2 , Mairead Furlong  1 , Siobhain O'Doherty  1 , Fiona Keogh  3 , Tim Stainton  4
Affiliations
Review

Individualized funding interventions to improve health and social care outcomes for people with a disability: A mixed-methods systematic review

Pádraic Fleming et al. Campbell Syst Rev. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This SR was conducted as part of Padraic Fleming''s (lead author) Ph.D. (Principal Supervisor SMcG). A potential conflict of interest may exist, in that both the lead author (PF) and the individualized funding initiatives that are the subject of his research, are funded by the same agency (i.e., Genio). However, it is important to note that PF is completing his Ph.D as part of a prestigious structured doctoral program in the field of population health/health services research called SPHeRE funded by the Health Research Board in Ireland (www.sphereprogramme.ie). All SPHeRE scholars receive intensive instruction in various methodologies during the course of their first year whilst they are also encouraged to pursue high standards, rigor and objectivity in everything that they do. Furthermore, they are supervised, not only by top health services researchers in the country, but are also supported and guided by an academic panel of senior health services/population health researchers throughout the course of their studies. Thus, the lead author strived to be as objective and independent as possible and any conflict of interest was disclosed in the reporting of the study. All necessary steps were also taken to avoid any bias that arose in this respect, such as MH independently reviewing the quality of PF and SMcG''s paper that was included in the review. FK was previously the Director of Research and Evidence in Genio. MF, TS, SOD and MH have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of study selection process
Figure 2
Figure 2
Risk of bias across studies [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 3
Figure 3
Confidence in individual studies based on CerQual headings [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 4
Figure 4
Example of coding levels 1 to 6 (Macro, Meso, Micro) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 5
Figure 5
Codes co‐occurring with ‘perceived benefits’ 60 times of more [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 6
Figure 6
Coding structure of ‘Implementation Facilitators’ [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 7
Figure 7
Coding structure of “Implementation challenges” [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 8
Figure 8
Quality of Life –Psychological Wellbeing – Glendinning et al. (2008) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 9
Figure 9
Quality of Life –Psychological Wellbeing – Woolham & Benton (2013) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 10
Figure 10
Client Satisfaction – Beatty et al. (1998) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 11
Figure 11
Client satisfaction (Technical Quality) – Benjamin et al. (2000) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 12
Figure 12
Client satisfaction (Service Impact) – Benjamin et al. (2000) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 13
Figure 13
Client satisfaction (General Satisfaction) – Benjamin et al. (2000) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 14
Figure 14
Client satisfaction (Interpersonal Manner) – Benjamin (2000) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 15
Figure 15
Client satisfaction (Provider shortcomings) ‐ Benjamin et al. (2000) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 16
Figure 16
Client Satisfaction – Caldwell et al. (2007) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 17
Figure 17
Physical Functioning – Woolham & Benton (2013) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 18
Figure 18
Unmet need – ADL – Benjamin et al. (2000) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 19
Figure 19
Unmet need – IADL – Benjamin et al. (2000) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 20
Figure 20
Unmet need – Physical or psychological risk – Benjamin et al. (2000) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 21
Figure 21
Unmet need – Caldwell et al. (2007) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 22
Figure 22
Other – Sense of security – Benjamin et al. (2000) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 23
Figure 23
Other – Community Participation – I vs C – Caldwell et al. (2007) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 24
Figure 24
Other – Community Participation – T1 to T3 – Caldwell et al. (2007) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 25
Figure 25
Other – ASCOT – Glendinning et al. (2008) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 26
Figure 26
Codes co‐occurring with “perceived benefits” 50 times or more [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 27
Figure 27
Codes co‐occurring with “flexibility” 12 times or more [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 28
Figure 28
Codes co‐occurring with “community integration” 10 times or more [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 29
Figure 29
Codes co‐occurring with ‘Agency involvement’ 15 times of more [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 30
Figure 30
Codes co‐occurring 12 times of more with ‘network of support’ [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 31
Figure 31
Codes co‐occurring 3 times of more with ‘Financial recognition for voluntary work’ [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 32
Figure 32
Codes co‐occurring 6 times of more with ‘trust’ [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 33
Figure 33
Codes co‐occurring 15 times of more with ‘Implementation facilitator – Staff / Organisational Perspective’ [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 34
Figure 34
Codes co‐occurring 10 times of more with “Local support organisations’ [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 35
Figure 35
Codes co‐occurring 10 times of more with ‘assessment’ [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 36
Figure 36
Codes co‐occurring 8 times of more with ‘training’ [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 37
Figure 37
Codes co‐occurring 10 times of more with ‘Human resources’ [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 38
Figure 38
Codes co‐occurring with ‘Perceived negative / challenging aspects’ 60 times of more [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 39
Figure 39
Codes co‐occurring 15 times of more with ‘Information needs’ [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 40
Figure 40
Codes co‐occurring 18 times of more with ‘Implementation challenges from perspective of staff / organisational representatives’ [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 41
Figure 41
Codes co‐occurring 5 times of more with ‘Fear’ [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 42
Figure 42
Codes co‐occurring 6 times of more with ‘Severity / type of disability’ [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 43
Figure 43
Codes co‐occurring 2 times of more with ‘Informal Setting’ [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

References to included studies

    1. Adams, L. , & Godwin, L. (2008). Employment aspects and workforce implications of direct payments.
    1. Alakeson, V. (2007). The contribution of self‐direction to improving the quality of mental health services.
    1. Beatty, P. W. , Richmond, G. W. , Tepper, S. , & DeJong, G. (1998). Personal assistance for people with physical disabilities: Consumer‐direction and satisfaction with services. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 79(6), 674–677. - PubMed
    1. Benjamin, A. E. , Matthias, R. , & Franke, T. M. (2000). Comparing consumer‐directed and agency models for providing supportive services at home. Health Services Research, 35(1 II), 351–366. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blumberg, E. R. , Ferguson, P. M. , & Ferguson, D. L. (2000). Slidin' into home: Supporting self‐determination through personal support agents and service brokerage strategies. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 15(2/3), 111–119.

References to excluded studies

    1. Abbott, D. , & Marriott, A. (2013). Money, finance and the personalisation agenda for people with learning disabilities in the UK: Some emerging issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(2), 106–113. 10.1111/j.1468-3156.2012.00728.x - DOI
    1. Ageing , & Aged, C. (2014). Evaluation of the consumer ‐ directed care initiative ‐ Final Report. Retrived from https://www.dss.gov.au/ageing‐and‐aged‐care‐publications‐and‐articles‐ag...
    1. Alakeson, V. (2008). Let patients control the purse strings. BMJ, 336(7648), 807–809. 10.1136/bmj.39524.400498.AD - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alakeson, V. (2008). Self‐directed care for adults with serious mental illness: The barriers to progress. Psychiatric Services, 59(7), 792–794. - PubMed
    1. Allen, D. (2008). Cash control. Learning Disability Practice, 11(10), 11.

Additional references

    1. Abramson, J. H. (2011). WINPEPI updated: Computer programs for epidemiologists, and their teaching potential. Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations:, 8(1), 1. 10.1186/1742-5573-8-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Áiseanna, T. (2014a). ÁT philosophy. Retrieved from http://www.theatnetwork.com/about‐us/at‐philosophy/
    1. Áiseanna, T. (2014b). What we do. Retrieved from http://www.theatnetwork.com/about‐us/what‐we‐do/
    1. Astbury, B. , & Leeuw, F. L. (2010). Unpacking black boxes: Mechanisms and theory building in evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 31(3), 363–381. 10.1177/1098214010371972 - DOI
    1. Beresford, P. (Ed.). (2014). Personalisation. Bristol, United Kingdom: Policy Press.

LinkOut - more resources