Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec;79(4):3883-3894.
doi: 10.1111/biom.13873. Epub 2023 May 17.

Pathological imaging-assisted cancer gene-environment interaction analysis

Affiliations

Pathological imaging-assisted cancer gene-environment interaction analysis

Kuangnan Fang et al. Biometrics. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

Gene-environment (G-E) interactions have important implications for cancer outcomes and phenotypes beyond the main G and E effects. Compared to main-effect-only analysis, G-E interaction analysis more seriously suffers from a lack of information caused by higher dimensionality, weaker signals, and other factors. It is also uniquely challenged by the "main effects, interactions" variable selection hierarchy. Effort has been made to bring in additional information to assist cancer G-E interaction analysis. In this study, we take a strategy different from the existing literature and borrow information from pathological imaging data. Such data are a "byproduct" of biopsy, enjoys broad availability and low cost, and has been shown as informative for modeling prognosis and other cancer outcomes/phenotypes in recent studies. Building on penalization, we develop an assisted estimation and variable selection approach for G-E interaction analysis. The approach is intuitive, can be effectively realized, and has competitive performance in simulation. We further analyze The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data on lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). The outcome of interest is overall survival, and for G variables, we analyze gene expressions. Assisted by pathological imaging data, our G-E interaction analysis leads to different findings with competitive prediction performance and stability.

Keywords: assisted analysis; cancer G-E interaction analysis; high-dimensional penalization; pathological imaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Heatmap of correlations between imaging features and gene expressions. This figure appears in color in the electronic version of this article, and any mention of color refers to that version.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Beck A and Tetruashvili L (2013). On the convergence of block coordinate descent type methods. SIAM Journal on Optimization 23, 2037–2060.
    1. Bien J, Taylor JE, and Tibshirani R (2013). A lasso for hierarchical interactions. Annals of Statistics 41, 1111–1141. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boyd S, Parikh N, Chu E, Peleato B, Eckstein J, et al. (2011). Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers. Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning 3, 1–122.
    1. Chai H, Shi X, Zhang Q, Zhao Q, Huang Y, and Ma S (2017). Analysis of cancer gene expression data with an assisted robust marker identification approach. Genetic Epidemiology 41, 779–789. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen C, Tang Y, Qu W, Han X, Zuo J, Cai Q, Xu G, Song Y, and Ke X (2021). Evaluation of clinical value and potential mechanism of mtfr2 in lung adenocarcinoma via bioinformatics. BMC Cancer 21, 619. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types