N-substituted tetrahydro-beta-carboline as mu-opioid receptors ligands: in silico study; molecular docking, ADMET and molecular dynamics approach
- PMID: 37133710
- DOI: 10.1007/s11030-023-10655-1
N-substituted tetrahydro-beta-carboline as mu-opioid receptors ligands: in silico study; molecular docking, ADMET and molecular dynamics approach
Abstract
Manipulating intracellular signals by interaction with transmembranal G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is the way of action of more than 30% of available medicines. Designing molecules against GPCRs is most challenging due to their flexible binding orthosteric and allosteric pockets, a property that lead to different mode and extent of activation of intracellular mediators. Here, in the current study we aimed to design N-substituted tetrahydro-beta-carbolines (THβC's) targeting Mu Opioid Receptors (MORs). We performed ligand docking study for reference and designed compounds against active and inactive states of MOR, as well as the active state bound to intracellular mediator of Gi. The reference compounds include 40 known agonists and antagonists, while the designed compounds include 25,227 N-substituted THβC analogues. Out of the designed compounds, 15 compounds were comparatively having better extra precision (XP) Gscore and were analyzed for absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion-toxicity (ADMET) properties, drug-likness, and molecular dynamic (MD) simulation. The results showed that N-substituted tetrahydro-beta-carbolines with and without C6-methoxy group substitutions (THBC/6MTHBC) analogues of A1/B1 and A9/B9 have relatively acceptable affinity and within pocket-stability toward MOR compared to the reference compounds of morphine (agonist) and naloxone (antagonist). Moreover, the designed analogues interact with key residue within the binding pocket of Asp 147 that is reported to be involved in receptor activation. In conclusion, the designed THBC analogues represent a good starting point for designing opioid receptor ligands other than morphinan scaffold, that have good synthetic accessibility which promotes feasible structural manipulation to tailor pharmacological effects with minimal side effects.
Keywords: ADMET; MOR; Mitrgaynine; Molecular docking; Molecular dynamics; Opioids.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Similar articles
-
Computational insights into the molecular mechanisms of differentiated allosteric modulation at the mu opioid receptor by structurally similar bitopic modulators.J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2020 Aug;34(8):879-895. doi: 10.1007/s10822-020-00309-x. Epub 2020 Mar 19. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2020. PMID: 32193867
-
Structural Determinants of Buprenorphine Partial Agonism at the μ-Opioid Receptor.J Chem Inf Model. 2025 May 26;65(10):5071-5085. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5c00078. Epub 2025 May 6. J Chem Inf Model. 2025. PMID: 40328437 Free PMC article.
-
Determination of Structural Requirements of N-Substituted Tetrahydro-β-Carboline Imidazolium Salt Derivatives Using in Silico Approaches for Designing MEK-1 Inhibitors.Molecules. 2017 Jun 19;22(6):1020. doi: 10.3390/molecules22061020. Molecules. 2017. PMID: 28629184 Free PMC article.
-
Probing biased activation of mu-opioid receptor by the biased agonist PZM21 using all atom molecular dynamics simulation.Life Sci. 2021 Mar 15;269:119026. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119026. Epub 2021 Jan 11. Life Sci. 2021. PMID: 33444617
-
Ligand-Free Signaling of G-Protein-Coupled Receptors: Relevance to μ Opioid Receptors in Analgesia and Addiction.Molecules. 2022 Sep 8;27(18):5826. doi: 10.3390/molecules27185826. Molecules. 2022. PMID: 36144565 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Computer-aided identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis resuscitation-promoting factor B (RpfB) inhibitors from Gymnema sylvestre natural products.Front Pharmacol. 2023 Nov 29;14:1325227. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1325227. eCollection 2023. Front Pharmacol. 2023. PMID: 38094882 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mahmod Al-Qattan MN, Mordi MN (2019) Molecular basis of modulating adenosine receptors activities. Curr Pharm Des. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612825666190304122624 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Galligan JJSC (2016) Insights into the role of opioid receptors in the GI tract: experimental evidence and therapeutic relevance. Handb Exp Pharmacol 239:363–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/164_2016_116 - DOI
-
- Kaserer T, Steinacher T, Kainhofer R et al (2020) Identification and characterization of plant-derived alkaloids, corydine and corydaline, as novel mu opioid receptor agonists. Sci Rep 10:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70493-1 - DOI
-
- Law PY, Reggio PH, Loh HH (2013) Opioid receptors: toward separation of analgesic from undesirable effects. Trends Biochem Sci 38:275–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2013.03.003 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Huang W, Manglik A, Venkatakrishnan AJ et al (2015) Structural insights into μ-opioid receptor activation. Nature 524:315–321. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14886 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials