Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1986 Jun 9;144(12):621-3.
doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1986.tb112341.x.

Factors affecting compliance in colorectal cancer screening. Results of a study performed in Ballarat

Factors affecting compliance in colorectal cancer screening. Results of a study performed in Ballarat

F A Macrae et al. Med J Aust. .

Abstract

Non-compliance in screening programmes for colorectal cancer is likely to be the most important factor limiting the impact of screening on mortality. This study aimed to determine risk factors and correlates of compliance that could be readily identified by general practitioners. A total of 581 eligible subjects aged 40 to 75 years completed a questionnaire that covered demographic factors, personal medical history, family history of colorectal cancer and smoking status. Faecal occult blood tests were then offered by the general practitioner and compliance correlated with responses. The over-all compliance was 44% and increased to 51% for those who accepted the self-testing kit at consultation. For men, compliance increased with increasing level of education and was significantly greater for non-smokers than for smokers. For women, compliance increased with increasing age, and was greater for those with either symptoms and/or a family history of colorectal cancer. A doctor group-practice factor appeared to influence acceptance versus refusal of the test kit from the doctor. A triage approach to screening in general practice may improve over-all compliance and the yield of tumours. With this strategy, patients at high risk (for example, those with a family history of colorectal cancer or in older age groups) are identified first. Particular attention should be given during consultation to those at high risk who have poor compliance profiles (for example male smokers with a family history of colorectal cancer). High-risk subjects with high compliance profiles would need less attention and low-risk individuals would need least attention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources