Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar;72(2):126-133.
doi: 10.1055/s-0043-57026. Epub 2023 May 3.

Computed Tomography Scan of the Aorta to Predict Type B Aortic Dissection

Han Lee  1   2 , Qing Zhou  1   2 , Haitao Zhang  1 , Min Jin  3 , XinLong Tang  1 , Kai Li  3 , Tayierjiang Tuoerxun  4
Affiliations

Computed Tomography Scan of the Aorta to Predict Type B Aortic Dissection

Han Lee et al. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study is to find the high-risk morphological features in type B aortic dissection (TBAD) population and to establish an early detection model.

Methods: From June 2018 to February 2022, 234 patients came to our hospital because of chest pain. After examination and definite diagnosis, we excluded people with previous cardiovascular surgery history, connective tissue disease, aortic arch variation, valve malformation, and traumatic dissection. Finally, we included 49 patients in the TBAD group and 57 in the control group. The imaging data were retrospectively analyzed by Endosize (Therevna 3.1.40) software. The aortic morphological parameters mainly include diameter, length, direct distance, and tortuosity index. Multivariable logistic regression models were performed and systolic blood pressure (SBP), aortic diameter at the left common carotid artery (D3), and length of ascending aorta (L1) were chosen to build a model. The predictive capacity of the models was evaluated through the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results: The diameters in the ascending aorta and aortic arch are larger in the TBAD group (33.9 ± 5.9 vs. 37.8 ± 4.9 mm, p < 0.001; 28.2 ± 3.9 vs. 31.7 ± 3.0 mm, p < 0.001). The ascending aorta was significantly longer in the TBAD group (80.3 ± 11.7 vs. 92.3 ± 10.6 mm, p < 0.001). Besides, the direct distance and tortuosity index of the ascending aorta in the TBAD group increased significantly (69.8 ± 9.0 vs. 78.7 ± 8.8 mm, p < 0.001; 1.15 ± 0.05 vs. 1.17 ± 0.06, p < 0.05). Multivariable models demonstrated that SBP, aortic diameter at the left common carotid artery (D3), and length of ascending aorta (L1) were independent predictors of TBAD occurrence. Based on the ROC analysis, area under the ROC curve of the risk prediction models was 0.831.

Conclusion: Morphological characteristic including diameter of total aorta, length of ascending aorta, direct distance of ascending aorta, and tortuosity index of ascending aorta are valuable geometric risk factors. Our model shows a good performance in predicting the incidence of TBAD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of the patient selection. TBAD, type B aortic dissection.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schematic of measurement; P1–5: Point 1–5; D1–5: Diameter 1–5; L1–5: Length1–5; DD5: Direct distance from point 1 to point 5.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
( A ) Comparison of diameter at different location. ( B ) Comparison of the length in different section. ( C ) Comparison of the direct distance in different section. ( D) Comparison of the tortuosity index (TI) in different section.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Systolic blood pressure (SBP); D3, diameter 3; and L1, length 1.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Vilacosta I, San Román J A, di Bartolomeo R et al. Acute aortic syndrome revisited: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78(21):2106–2125. - PubMed
    1. Lombardi J V, Hughes G C, Appoo J J et al. Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) reporting standards for type B aortic dissections. J Vasc Surg. 2020;71(03):723–747. - PubMed
    1. Alberta H B, Takayama T, Smits T C et al. Aortic arch morphology and aortic length in patients with dissection, traumatic, and aneurysmal disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;50(06):754–760. - PubMed
    1. Poullis M. Aortic length and curvature and risk of aortic dissection. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2021;62(04):410. - PubMed
    1. Krüger T, Sandoval Boburg R, Lescan M et al. Aortic elongation in aortic aneurysm and dissection: the Tübingen Aortic Pathoanatomy (TAIPAN) project. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;54(01):26–33. - PubMed

MeSH terms