Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 3;13(5):e068499.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068499.

Protocol for a feasibility, acceptability and safety study of the PICO device (negative pressure wound therapy) in acute paediatric burns

Affiliations

Protocol for a feasibility, acceptability and safety study of the PICO device (negative pressure wound therapy) in acute paediatric burns

Emma Joan Lumsden et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in acute burn care may decrease the time to re-epithelialisation by more than 20%. Despite this, the perceived burden of use; including therapeutic, physical and financial, have limited the use of NPWT in acute burn care. This might be minimised by using the small, ultraportable, single-use NPWT device PICO as opposed to larger devices, which to date has never been studied in acute burn care. This research will; therefore, primarily assess the feasibility, acceptability and safety of PICO in paediatric burns. Secondary outcomes include time to re-epithelialisation, pain, itch, cost and scar formation.

Methods and analysis: This protocol details a clinical trial methodology and is pre-results. This single site, prospective, pilot randomised controlled trial will be conducted in an Australian quaternary paediatric burns centre. Participants must be aged ≤16 years, otherwise well and managed within 24 hours of sustaining a burn that fits beneath a PICO dressing. Thirty participants will be randomised to one of three groups: group A: Mepitel and ACTICOAT, group B: Mepitel, ACTICOAT and PICO and group C: Mepitel, ACTICOAT Flex and PICO. Patient outcomes will be recorded at each dressing change to assess efficacy and safety outcomes until 3 months postburn wound re-epithelialisation. Surveys, randomisation and data storage will be undertaken via online platforms and physical data storage collated at the Centre for Children's Health Research, Brisbane, Australia. Analysis will be done by using StataSE 17.0 statistical software.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethics has been obtained from Queensland Health and Griffith Human Research Ethics committees including a site-specific approval. These data will be disseminated via clinical meetings, conference presentations and peer-reviewed journals.

Trial registration number: ACTRN12622000009718.

Keywords: clinical trials; paediatric surgery; qualitative research; statistics & research methods; surgery; wound management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: While Smith & Nephew donated a grant for this study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant timeline—schedule of enrolment and data collection. BBSIP, Brisbane Burns Scar Impact Profile; DC, dressing change, POH, point of healing; TBSA, total body surface area.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Health AIo, Welfare . Australia’s children. Canberra: AIHW, 2022.
    1. Peden M, Oyegbite K, Ozanne-Smith J. World report on child injury prevention. Albany, SWITZERLAND: World Health Organization, 2008. - PubMed
    1. Finnerty CC, Jeschke MG, Branski LK, et al. . Hypertrophic scarring: the greatest unmet challenge after burn injury. Lancet 2016;388:1427–36. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31406-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown NJ, Kimble RM, Gramotnev G, et al. . Predictors of re-epithelialization in pediatric burn. Burns 2014;40:751–8. 10.1016/j.burns.2013.09.027 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lonie S, Baker P, Teixeira RP. Healing time and incidence of hypertrophic scarring in paediatric scalds. Burns 2017;43:509–13. 10.1016/j.burns.2016.09.011 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types